> These products appear to me to be intended for use within close
> proximity to a sound source. Their use above or behind an orchestra,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Savant
Thank you Savant,
I think you are right, it can't be compared to the RPG's modex after
all. Before going back to your topic,
> Angelo mentioned that you have a hall to treat, but I saw nothing about that
> in your post. Regardless, I find the idea of adding resonance to a listening
> room, as suggested on that site, to be the wrong approach. The usual
> treatment goal for smaller rooms as shown in the photos on that site is to
> remove resonances, not add them.
You are right Ethan, there is no hall to be treated and I agree with
you to remove resonances. At the end, I was jsut curious about this
product and wondering if someone uses this and listen to it. As
mentiond by Savant above, it is a useful acoustic shell, which I agree
(if the coloration due to the resonance can be tuned/controlled).
It is said in the website that this is a wall resonator. I'm curious
if this really change the spectral of the instrument nearby
(regardless of the comb filtering). I am sorry if my question was not
clear. The panel looks hard, so a reflection can occur and comb
filtering will happen depending on the distance between the source and
the wall resonator, and again If the spectral can really be tuned,
this is the interesting part and I m wondering if someone use this/
listen to this before. Thanks for the responses.
Hadi
Ethan Winer - 12 May 2007 15:55 GMT
Hadi,
> It is said in the website that this is a wall resonator.
My take on this is it's a bogus product aimed at audiophiles with more money
than common sense. There are a lot of products like that aimed at gullible
audiophooles, based entirely on the placebo effect. Such as the Cathedral
Panels and Fast Audio Resonators described in my Acoustics Fraud Report:
http://www.ethanwiner.com/fraud.html
It may be legitimate as a reflector to "amplify" a soloist, like the rear
wall of an outdoors band shell. But the explanations are pure BS:
Harmonization of the oscillation and thereby
- ideal beginning and ending of the cycles
- great oscillation stability
- high degree of resonance effectiveness
- ideal dissolution of sound
- high transparency of tone and speech
I HATE it when my cycles don't begin and end ideally! Sheesh.
The lack of pricing is also suspect. "Ask us for a quote!" I don't have time
to play 20 questions. Just tell me how much it costs, okay? :->)
--Ethan