Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / December 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

*Intentional* phase-cancellation necessity/problem

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul C. Weber - 26 Dec 2003 08:24 GMT
I am working on an audiovisual installation and I need to obtain
*acoustically* the same result one obtains by electrically summing two
180 deg. out-of-phase signals - i.e. silence.

Somehow the results of my first experiments are somewhat frustrating,
as all I obtaing is a diffuse soundfield without any clear directional
component - but that's not what I need.

I believe this has primarily to do with room reflections bouncing
around and messing up the cancellation effect.

For your info, I am feeding a monophonic spoken-voice recording in two
speakers set exactly opposite, one of the speaker being wired (of
course) out-of-phase and I'm looking to find that null-spot where both
signals cancel each other out.

The final installation would (in theory) feature 2 sets of opposite
placed speakers, each pair running a different signal, of course, but
at the end of the day I'm starting to believe that this may not be
possible unless I create a perfect anechoic chamber (extremely
expensive and out of the scope of the artist), but I'm still willing
to give other solutions a try...

Does anybody have any ideas in this respect?
Thank you!

Paul Weber
JingleJungle Music

[Please note this message has been intentionally cross-posted to other
goups such as rec.audio.pro, alt.scy.physics.acoustics, da7.com,
musicplayer.com, etc]
Eberhard Sengpiel - 26 Dec 2003 08:37 GMT
> I am working on an audiovisual installation and I need to obtain
> *acoustically* the same result one obtains by electrically summing two
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> to give other solutions a try...
> Does anybody have any ideas in this respect?

Hallo Paul,

Don't forget that your two ears are not at on point in ambience,
some 20 cm (8 inch) apart. You receive binaural sound.
Close one ear and you get a little more success.

Eberhard Sengpiel
Paul C. Weber - 26 Dec 2003 14:49 GMT
> Hallo Paul,

> Don't forget that your two ears are not at on point in ambience,

> some 20 cm (8 inch) apart. You receive binaural sound.

> Close one ear and you get a little more success.

> Eberhard Sengpiel

Thank you, Eberhard...
I've already received some answers along these lines from the fellows
at rec.audio.pro.
Guess I was looking for the Holy Grail, or the acoustic equivalent of
the philosopher's stone! ;)

Anyway, do have a Very Happy New Year, wherever that may be...

Paul Weber
San Pietro
Ticino,
Switzerland
Angelo Campanella - 26 Dec 2003 19:00 GMT
> I am working on an audiovisual installation and I need to obtain
> *acoustically* the same result one obtains by electrically summing two
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> course) out-of-phase and I'm looking to find that null-spot where both
> signals cancel each other out.

With stereo now on TV, I sense that their audio guys are playing with it
to the extent that when they put a dubbed sound in, with opposite phases
on right vs left, the sound I hear seems (to my ear/brain system)
to be coming from somewhere to the right or left of the screen; e.g., a
doorbell or phone ring.

My comment leap-frogs ahead of your discussion of sound cancellation,
but it serves to demonstrate the much bigger picture of 3-dimensional
properties of sound propagation. In my example, you can see that the
sound was cancelled as expected in the direction where the two speakers
were equidistant from my ears. But in the direction 90 degrees away
right and left, sound was not cancelled, but went on to enter the
reverberant field of my living room. This reverberat sound then was
perceived by me as coming from "somewere else" (than theTV in front of me).

> The final installation would (in theory) feature 2 sets of opposite
> placed speakers, each pair running a different signal, of course, but
> at the end of the day I'm starting to believe that this may not be
> possible unless I create a perfect anechoic chamber (extremely
> expensive and out of the scope of the artist), but I'm still willing
> to give other solutions a try...

Try projecting mono-speech trough the stereo pair, oppositely phased as
I mentioned. Could make a nice demo for the spatial properties of rooms
and stereo..... Also implies the difficulty/futility of 3D noise
cancellation.

Angelo Campanella
Ian W - 26 Dec 2003 23:22 GMT
Have you thought about pulling out the mains plug.? ;-)

> I am working on an audiovisual installation and I need to obtain
> *acoustically* the same result one obtains by electrically summing two
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> goups such as rec.audio.pro, alt.scy.physics.acoustics, da7.com,
> musicplayer.com, etc]
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.