Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Norris Prizes for Seraph Piano Compositions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stephen Norris - 22 Jun 2004 03:14 GMT
Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
in the links below:

http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=d3d647a9.0406082151.74b3c7e4@posting.goog
le.com

http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=20040422192417.24625.00000224@mb-m01.aol.com

http://mathforum.org/discuss/sci.math/mbig/557148/557148

Prizewinning works will be performed in a public concert when ten
prizes have been awarded.

Compositions which would require design modifications will be
considered until development of the instrument has being completed.
   
Entries, written in a suitable music notation, should be submitted to
apollonicon@aol.com .
Dr.Matt - 22 Jun 2004 03:31 GMT
>Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
>awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>Entries, written in a suitable music notation, should be submitted to
>apollonicon@aol.com .

I skimmed a bit of this. Somewhere there's a recording of a special
version Stravinsky wrote of Les Noches for an ensemble of electromechanical
auto-repeating pianos. I just couldn't see a repeating hammer-driven
mechanism sounding any different, certainly not sounding any more voice-
or wind-like than a cymbalom. Now, an e-bow-based mechanism, THAT could
be the start of something.

Signature

       Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
                        Music: Splendor in Sound
"Hey, don't knock Placebo, its the only thing effective for my hypochondria."
   Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Stephen Norris - 22 Jun 2004 05:51 GMT
>>Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
>>awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>or wind-like than a cymbalom. Now, an e-bow-based mechanism, THAT could
>be the start of something.

My interest is in promoting the composition of new music.

Auto-repeating pianos and cymbaloms cannot repeat notes quite fast enough to
produce a perceived continuous tone (which requires about 25 Hz repeat rate).
Seraph pianos are capable of dynamic variation and vibrato within continuous
tones, and can produce perceived smooth slides using the sixth-tone feature.
Piano transcriptions of the output of a spectral analyser can produce voice
effects quite easily - compositions for orchestra, which recognisably simulate
speech when performed correctly, have been written using similar techniques.
Stephen Norris - 22 Jun 2004 06:32 GMT
> >Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
> >awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> or wind-like than a cymbalom. Now, an e-bow-based mechanism, THAT could
> be the start of something.

My interest is in promoting the composition and performance of new
music.

Auto-repeating pianos and cymbaloms cannot repeat notes quite fast
enough to produce a perceived continuous tone (which requires about 25
Hz repeat rate). Seraph pianos are capable of dynamic variation and
vibrato within continuous tones, and smooth slides can be performed
using the sixth-tone feature. The output of a spectral analyser can
quite easily be used to generate Seraph piano transcriptions of vocal
effects - compositions for orchestra, which recognisably simulate
speech when performed correctly, have been written using similar
techniques.
Dr.Matt - 22 Jun 2004 12:37 GMT
>> >Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
>> >awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>speech when performed correctly, have been written using similar
>techniques.

Hmmm, let us know when you've got a working model in the real world.
I for one am more interested in real-world music than hypotheses.
I still say completely replacing the hammers with e-bows is the way
to go.

Signature

       Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
                        Music: Splendor in Sound
"Hey, don't knock Placebo, its the only thing effective for my hypochondria."
   Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Stephen Norris - 23 Jun 2004 09:43 GMT
> >> >Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
> >> >awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> I still say completely replacing the hammers with e-bows is the way
> to go.

Well, when you've finished skimming bits of e-mails and mindlessly
posting your reply minutes after having not understood the important
ideas in them, perhaps you should start replacing hammers with e-bows
if that is what you think would be best. Did you skim the first
paragraph of the above link
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=20040422192417.24625.00000224@mb-m01.aol.com
which states "the neo-Bechstein electric pianos of the 1930s were the
precursor of the modern electric guitar for example, and pianos have
been built which use circular rotating 'bows' to sound the strings
like a violin."  Your idea has already been tried - such instruments
are impossibly difficult to play and therefore useless (as discussed
in the above link http://mathforum.org/discuss/sci.math/mbig/557148/557148).

I'm not sure if you are serious about having an interest in
"real-world music rather than hypotheses", unless you interest is in
discouraging the efforts of composers, performers, instrumentalists
and other musicians who struggle to reach an audience.  Your phrase
'working model' implies to me that you have an old-fashioned notion of
the idea of patenting new inventions - there are no new ideas in
Seraph pianos, all parts of which have already been built, but there
is no music written for them.

The purpose of charitable organisations such as the Norris Prize fund
is to encourage the composition and performance of new music by
providing financial assistance to deserving musicians.  What exactly
is the purpose of your badly-thought-out replies to my postings?
Dr.Matt - 23 Jun 2004 12:10 GMT
Ask a friend to show you an e-bow. Your "circular bow" idea suggests
cluelessness.

Signature

       Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
                        Music: Splendor in Sound
"Hey, don't knock Placebo, its the only thing effective for my hypochondria."
   Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Stephen Norris - 23 Jun 2004 21:26 GMT
>Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
>awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Entries, written in a suitable music notation, should be submitted to
>apollonicon@aol.com .

>>I skimmed a bit of this. Somewhere there's a recording of a
>>special version Stravinsky wrote of Les Noches for an ensemble
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>cymbalom. Now, an e-bow-based mechanism, THAT could be the start
>>of something.

>My interest is in promoting the composition and performance of new
>music.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>which simulate recognisable speech when performed correctly,
>have been written using similar techniques.

>>Hmmm, let us know when you've got a working model in the real world.
>>I for one am more interested in real-world music than hypotheses.
>>I still say completely replacing the hammers with e-bows is the way
>>to go.

>Well, when you've finished skimming bits of e-mails and mindlessly
>posting your reply minutes after having not understood the important
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>providing financial assistance to deserving musicians.  What exactly
>is the purpose of your badly-thought-out replies to my postings?

>>Ask a friend to show you an e-bow. Your "circular bow" idea suggests
>>cluelessness.

If your purpose is to advertise e-bows ( http://www.ebow.com ) for
electric guitars, this is not the right thread for you to be
contributing to - Seraph pianos are NOT electronic instruments or
synthesizers, they are computer-assisted sixth-tone acoustic pianos.

You seem to think that the "circular bow" idea was mine but in fact I
pointed out that such instruments were built in the 1930s (as were the
auto-repeating pianos which you mentioned and the neo-Bechstein
electric pianos which led to the development of the modern electric
guitar).  It is probably possible to replace the hammers of an
electric piano with e-bows as you suggested, but my own idea is for an
acoustic instrument.

If compositions are written featuring Seraph pianos, the instruments
can be built in due course as necessary; there are no technical
problems with manufacturing them, and few questions as to their
usefulness.  The compass and other features of the modern piano have
been extended in the past because of the efforts of composers - Ravel
wrote a top D-flat in one piano piece and a bottom G-sharp in another
(Steinway concert grands have been built with notes down to a low F,
mainly to improve the overall acoustic resonances and sonorities of
the instrument, though I haven't seen an instrument with the D-flat).
Dr.Matt - 23 Jun 2004 21:58 GMT
>If your purpose is to advertise e-bows ( http://www.ebow.com ) for
>electric guitars, this is not the right thread for you to be
>contributing to - Seraph pianos are NOT electronic instruments or
>synthesizers, they are computer-assisted sixth-tone acoustic pianos.

Very silly. E-bows can be used anywhere where the strings have a
significant iron content, or where a metal object can be safely clipped
onto the strings.

[blather deleted]

>If compositions are written featuring Seraph pianos,

I'm a composer. When you've got mp3s of the instrument, let me
know.

> the instruments
>can be built in due course as necessary;

Whereas without resorting to pie in the sky, just about any
sound can be assembled in the digital domain already, by the
composer in many cases.

Speaking as a composer, I am not interested in devoting my effort to
writing for a hypothetical instrument with a bunch of characteristics
far outside the realm of experience which I cannot try out during the
compositional process. Existing computerized methods allow composers
to try out all sorts of sounds right here and now rather than in
hypothesis.
  From my perspective, it sounds like you're asking for a bunch of
free repertoire with which to justify the manufacture of your
instrument, whereas if you had a prototype on which you could actually
play music, you might be able to get folks interested in writing for
it. This approach has worked for Terman, Moog, Yamaha, Boesendorfer,
and many others. Most composers simply don't have the clout of a Richard
Wagner to bring about the development of a custom instrument---and
Wagner's specialized tubas are not that different from euphoniums and
saxhorns. Speaking of Sax, there's yet another inventor.

Send an mp3 when you've got an instrument.

Signature

       Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
                        Music: Splendor in Sound
"Hey, don't knock Placebo, its the only thing effective for my hypochondria."
   Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Stephen Norris - 24 Jun 2004 09:35 GMT
> >Entries are requested for Norris prizes, value $1000 per prizewinner,
> >awarded to composers of music featuring the Seraph piano as described
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >Entries, written in a suitable music notation, should be submitted to
> >apollonicon@aol.com .

> I skimmed a bit of this. Somewhere there's a recording of a special
> version Stravinsky wrote of Les Noches for an ensemble of electromechanical
> auto-repeating pianos. I just couldn't see a repeating hammer-driven
> mechanism sounding any different, certainly not sounding any more voice-
> or wind-like than a cymbalom. Now, an e-bow-based mechanism, THAT could
> be the start of something.

> >My interest is in promoting the composition and performance of
> >new music.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> >the instruments
> >can be built in due course as necessary;

> Very silly. E-bows can be used anywhere where the strings have a
> significant iron content, or where a metal object can be safely clipped
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Wagner's specialized tubas are not that different from euphoniums and
> saxhorns. Speaking of Sax, there's yet another inventor.

Have you no imagination?  How do you think composers such as Brahms,
Mozart and all the other great composers of the past composed
orchestral music featuring effects which had never before been heard?

Perhaps you personally should think of Seraph pianos as instruments
designed for deaf composers.  They are acoustic instruments, not
digital pianos or synthesizers, and any composer with an understanding
of how they work and a musical imagination capable of writing music
without first having heard it will find the instruments easy to write
for effectively.

Influential composers such as Pierre Boulez (composer of Le Marteau
sans Maitre - 'the hammer without a master') could probably
single-handedly prevent development of the instruments if they
disapproved of them, other than that, no particular 'clout' is
required from composers.   I am asking for some repertoire so that I
can justify manufacturing the instrument myself - if their is
insufficient interest I shall spend my time and money on something
else.

> Send an mp3 when you've got an instrument.

> >Prizewinning works will be performed in a public concert when ten prizes have been awarded.
Dr.Matt - 24 Jun 2004 12:11 GMT
>Have you no imagination?  How do you think composers such as Brahms,
>Mozart and all the other great composers of the past composed
>orchestral music featuring effects which had never before been heard?

Very silly. They had in fact heard them all, and almost all of them
PLAYED them all. Especially Brahms, who was from the era of composers
who could sub for any player in an orchestra. It sounds to me like you
need new imagination for ways to raise funds.

>Perhaps you personally should think of Seraph pianos as instruments
>designed for deaf composers.  They are acoustic instruments, not
>digital pianos or synthesizers, and any composer with an understanding
>of how they work and a musical imagination capable of writing music
>without first having heard it will find the instruments easy to write
>for effectively.

Don't just tell me about the instruments, show me one.

>Influential composers such as Pierre Boulez (composer of Le Marteau
>sans Maitre - 'the hammer without a master') could probably
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> >Prizewinning works will be performed in a public concert when ten
>prizes have been awarded.

Send an mp3 when you've got an instrument.

Signature

       Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
                        Music: Splendor in Sound
"Hey, don't knock Placebo, its the only thing effective for my hypochondria."
   Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Angelo Campanella - 26 Jun 2004 15:40 GMT
Comment: This cross-posting thread hopefully is not too marginal for the
technical subjects treated in alt.sci.physics.acoustics

    I find the subject of new music sounds otherwise fascinating......

> Influential composers such as Pierre Boulez (composer of Le Marteau
> sans Maitre - 'the hammer without a master') could probably
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> insufficient interest I shall spend my time and money on something
> else.

    Can someone ere describe (mechanically and tone-wise) the Seraph piano
as distinguished from the conventional hammer-klavier?

    Angelo campanella
Signature

             ---------   www.CampanellaAcoustics.com  ---------

"I have simply studied carefully whatever I've undertaken, and tried to
hold a reserve that would carry me through." - Charles A. Lindbergh.

"As for background noise level; 35 dBA is a good classroom; 45 dBA is a
sound masking system!" - Anthony K. Hoover

Dr.Matt - 27 Jun 2004 18:29 GMT
>Comment: This cross-posting thread hopefully is not too marginal for the
>technical subjects treated in alt.sci.physics.acoustics
>
>    I find the subject of new music sounds otherwise fascinating......

>    Can someone ere describe (mechanically and tone-wise) the Seraph piano
>as distinguished from the conventional hammer-klavier?

Certainly. The conventional hammer-klavier has been heard, and the Seraph
piano is a plan for the future.

Signature

       Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
                        Music: Splendor in Sound
"Hey, don't knock Placebo, its the only thing effective for my hypochondria."
   Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.