Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / October 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Microphone spiking 450Hz?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tomi M - 01 Oct 2004 00:37 GMT
Microphone spiking 450Hz?

Hi,

I'm planning to do measurements with microphone in the frequency range of
380-510 Hz.  Sound, in the question, is low amplitude sine wave and is
surrounded of lots of noise.

I thought first step is to find a microphone which is specially designed to
this frequency range. So, that the mechanical resonance frequency is close
by. Do you know where to buy, or how to build one? Or is there any?

If you have tips to give, please do, I have not done sound measurements
before.

*/Tomi
The Ghost - 02 Oct 2004 00:35 GMT
> Microphone spiking 450Hz?
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> measurements before.
> */Tomi


A tuned microphone can be easily constructed by attaching a tube of
appropriate length and diameter to a Panasonic electret mic capsule to form
a Helmholtz resonator (acoustic mass of tube resonating with equivalent
volume of mic capsule).  However, using a tuned microphone is not the
proper way to make the measurement that you propose.  The proper approach
would be to measure the sound with a broadband microphone and to perform a
narrow-band FFT analysis on the broadband sound.  
Tomi M - 05 Oct 2004 22:24 GMT
Thank you for pointing out Helmholz resonators!

"The proper approach would be to measure the sound with a broadband
microphone and to perform a narrow-band FFT analysis on the broadband
sound."

I'm planning to do narrow-band FFT to the signal recorded using tuned
microphone. I have an idea that if works better that way. But well, I'm not
sure at all this works, it should though?

*/Tomi

> > Microphone spiking 450Hz?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> would be to measure the sound with a broadband microphone and to perform a
> narrow-band FFT analysis on the broadband sound.
The Ghost - 05 Oct 2004 18:35 GMT
> Thank you for pointing out Helmholz resonators!

snip....snip

> I'm planning to do narrow-band FFT to the signal recorded using tuned
> microphone. I have an idea that if works better that way. But well,
> I'm not sure at all this works, it should though?

If, as you previously stated, you have a low amplitude sine wave burried in
broadband external noise, it is unlikely that a tuned microphone is going
to provide better S/N than a broadband microphone.  The only case in which
a tuned microphone would help is if the external noise as a spectral dip at
the same frequency of the sinusoid you are trying to measure AND if the
level of the sinusoid you are trying to measure is below the spectral level
of the electrical noise floor of the microphone for the particular FFT
analysis bandwidth that you are using.    
Ron Capik - 06 Oct 2004 18:54 GMT
> > Thank you for pointing out Helmholz resonators!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> of the electrical noise floor of the microphone for the particular FFT
> analysis bandwidth that you are using.

A tuned system will help reduce out of band noise but (as noted above) you
still
have in band noise to deal with.
However, synchronous detection techniques can do wonders with SNR.
Don't know if this would be practical with your source.
Maybe check some of the NASA tech briefs and papers on satellite
communications.

Later...

Ron Capik
NJ Pinelands Cultural Society
--
Brian Marston - 07 Oct 2004 01:24 GMT
> Microphone spiking 450Hz?
> Hi,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> */Tomi

I'm not sure that see the need for eliminating the frequencies below 380Hz and
above 510Hz at the measurement stage, rather these regions can be ignored at the
analysis stage. HAve you considered a band pass filter after the microphone.

"Low amplitude sine wave" suggests that you are looking for a tone of consistent
amplitude (with time), in a random "noise background". FFT across the restricted
band width and look at the average energy levels over an extended time period.

What is the source of the "sine wave"? I have dealt with this type of situation
previously in a number of industrial applications (one of which is currently
under patent).
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.