Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / December 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

equal loudness, 1/3 octaves, and adding phons

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brian Ravnaas - 21 Dec 2004 11:23 GMT
i am trying to piece together a spreadsheet to model noise (just boring
old 1/3 octave noise sources to be combined with 1/3 octave background
noise and/or transmission loss data, etc.)...  nothing so formal, just
intended to grant an idea.

in addition to the regular dBA, i have implemented method A from ISO
532 (stevens).  I decided that method B was beyond the scope of my
programming interest, so for purposes of utilizing method A, all the
data is combined into octave bands.

my first query is philosophical in nature - is applying something like
ISO 226 & Robinson-Dadson to this type of application (1/3 octave
generalized spectra intended to represent music, restaurant noise, the
noise in my bedroom, etc., etc.) an acceptable idea?

the pure tones -vs- dynamic broadband noise is a notable difference,
but can any real harm come from it, so to speak?

my second query is technical in nature - is the addition of phon levels
at various bands generally handled by conversion to sones, processing,
and then re-converting to phons?  The goal would be to create a "total"
level of phons for an ISO-226 adjusted curve.

Does anyone ever add phons logarithmically ala dBA (it seems not)?
So in any case, thanks in advance,

Brian
Brian Ravnaas - 22 Dec 2004 04:44 GMT
to add a bit of food for thought:

the A, B, and C weighting scales are said to be based upon the 40, 70,
and 90 phon curves from Fletcher & Munson, and they are added
logarithmically.  If one utilized Fletch & Munson (or another set of
equal loudness) to assess a "phon" level, perhaps this would be
analagous to a dynamic weighting scale, so to speak.

i 110% realize this is no official standard, but that's not the goal.

the deviations between that method and converting to sones and
estimating via 0.85*max + 0.15*sum, then converting back to phons are
not immense (at least in the curves i've peeked at so far), typically
within a few phons, but some noteworthy trends are observable.

maybe this is to peculiar or un-answerable to be of interest, but it
floated onto the brian the other day...  :)

Brian
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.