Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / April 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Audio recordings "leaching" onto adjacent tape sides?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
paul@paullee.com - 28 Mar 2005 20:32 GMT
Hi all,
I'm aware that, in domestic compact cassettes, if you listen to a
blank, or silent area on one side of a tape, you can hear a faint,
reversed "echo" from the other side. I believe that this is due to the
audio tape being very tightly wound and the magnetic impressions being
imprinted onto the opposing side (...?)

I was wondering if the following situation was possible. Suppose you
have a reel to reel tape, with a recording on only one side - each side
has two tracks. Would it be possible for a recording on a an adjacent
side of the tape to "come through" to the top surface?

For instance, if we have
A - blank (side two, reel two)
B  - audio tracks (side one, reel two)
C - blank (side two, reel one)
D - audio tracks (side one, reel one)

Would it be possible to hear a recording on side D, from side B?

Best wishes

Paul
Angelo Campanella - 29 Mar 2005 04:41 GMT
> I'm aware that, in domestic compact cassettes, if you listen to a
> blank, or silent area on one side of a tape, you can hear a faint,
> reversed "echo" from the other side. I believe that this is due to the
> audio tape being very tightly wound and the magnetic impressions being
> imprinted onto the opposing side (...?)

Correct me if I am wrong. I believe there are two independent phenomena
here:

1- "transfer" where one layer of tape lies on top of the turn below. In
this case a weak transfer can occur. This can he identified as an "echo
the appropriate time later (one circumference/tape speed). Is is equally
likely that a transfer from the layer on top also occurs, so one may
hear as many as THREE renditions; the proper one, one turn before and
one turn after. I have heard this on some old 120 minute cassettes that
have an extra thin substrate.

2- "cross-talk" where the playback head (possibly also the recording
head) sprays a wide enough pattern of magnetism that some of it
registers in the vicinity of the "other" pair of tracks. I have not
heard this one (yet).

> I was wondering if the following situation was possible. Suppose you
> have a reel to reel tape, with a recording on only one side - each side
> has two tracks. Would it be possible for a recording on a an adjacent
> side of the tape to "come through" to the top surface?

That's the one I have often heard.

> For instance, if we have
> A - blank (side two, reel two)
> B  - audio tracks (side one, reel two)
> C - blank (side two, reel one)
> D - audio tracks (side one, reel one)
> Would it be possible to hear a recording on side D, from side B?

If by "reel" you mean successive turns on a single spool, yes.

    Angelo Campanella
fagen@myrealbox.com - 29 Mar 2005 07:47 GMT
Recording takes place on ONLY one side, call it the front side.  NOT on
the back. The typical 1/4" home stereo cassette tape has two heads (L &
R) and records four tracks on on the tape, but only two at a time.
Usually the record heads are positioned so they record the left and
right tracks on the top 1/8 inch of the tape. Flipping the tape over,
it  then records on the 1/8 inch that was previously the bottom.  There
is a small, blank, gap between each track.  Depending on the quality of
the tape, alignment of the heads, and cleanliness of the heads, and
probably a few other factors, there may be a bleed wher the signal get
recorded on a wider portion of the tape tahn intended.   Or the
playback heads may be out of alignment just enough that they are
picking up signal from the adjacent track.  (Like not staying in your
lane driving down the highway).

As Ang mentioned, there is the possibility of bleed through with
ultrathin tape, but I  believe this is a thing of the past.

Do a google search for "recording tape track layout" and you will find
a number of articles.

Regards,

Dave
paul@paullee.com - 31 Mar 2005 02:05 GMT
Thanks my friend - is there any way for such an effect to be manifested
on a belt recording that is not magnetic (ie. grooved, like a record)?

Best wishes

Paul
boB_K7IQ - 02 Apr 2005 21:40 GMT
I believe what you are referring to is called "print thorugh"

thx,
boB

>Thanks my friend - is there any way for such an effect to be manifested
>on a belt recording that is not magnetic (ie. grooved, like a record)?
>
>Best wishes
>
>Paul
Tony - 02 Apr 2005 22:32 GMT
>>Thanks my friend - is there any way for such an effect to be manifested
>>on a belt recording that is not magnetic (ie. grooved, like a record)?

There can certainly be such an effect with gramophone (phonograph) records.
But what sort of recording is grooved and on a belt?
Signature

Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group.

Porky - 03 Apr 2005 06:32 GMT
> I believe what you are referring to is called "print thorugh"
>
> thx,
> boB

  Correct, and this is why studios always wind the tape "tail out", or
backwards. That way, the print through will be less audible.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.