> It seems you have to rely on measurements, and even those show rather
> large variations over different labs. Programs like Insul etc do not
> come up with usable data.
It is next to impossible to compute the effective sound isolation of
most construction materials.
Only if the material is "limp" can it hope to obey the mass law.
Because construction materials must provide structural stiffness, they
will have resilient resonance modes. At each resonance mode, the sound
transmission is enhanced, and the transmission loss is very much less
than the mass law.
Because the frequency range of sound extends as much as ten octaves (up
to three decades), the possible modes of vibration are only this side of
infinity.
Mathematical models that take ALL of these resonances into consideration
do not yet exist in my experience. Mind you, the problem is three
dimensional, while most TL formulas are one dimensional. Where does that
lead us?
So you have two choices:
1- Forget about noise isolation. It's hopeless. everybody should wear
ANC earmuffs.
2- Build a full scale specimen of the assembly in question and measure
its noise reduction in a laboratory, or in a field test.
Your choice.
Angelo Campanella
CSL - 06 Jul 2005 02:46 GMT
Many thanks to Stewart and Campanella !! Actually, I also dont want to use
some complex methods for predicting the resulted STC ... I just want some
simple ones ( Now, it seems hopeless, right ). Now, I can save time in
searching models and go for searching test data instead. Thanks again.
"Angelo Campanella" <a.campanella@att.net>
???????:ydyye.389804$cg1.259671@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> It seems you have to rely on measurements, and even those show rather
>> large variations over different labs. Programs like Insul etc do not
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Angelo Campanella