Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / July 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

STC estimation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CSL - 05 Jul 2005 08:09 GMT
Hello, I would like to ask about the method of estimating STC values of
double glazed windows.  E.g. I look up some textbook that a  "8mm-12mm air
gap-10mm" double glazed system has STC of 37 .... based on this data,  if I
want to know the STC of a "8mm-7mm air gap-8mm" system, how to do the
estimation ?  Is the estimation based on formula or just by experience ?

I think the estimation method can be applied to double wall systems too, am
I right ?

Thanks.

CSL
Noral Stewart - 05 Jul 2005 12:23 GMT
The methods of calculating are very complex.  You have to estimate the
transmission loss or blockage ability at various frequencies and then figure
out the STC.  More commonly especially for windows, we rely on test data.
For windows you also must recognize that the condition of seals is
important.  Another factor to consider is that STC can be very misleading
with respect to blockage of typical outdoor sounds from transportation noise
that contain strong low frequency content.  You can improve the STC of a
wall or window by several points by improving blockage at higher
frequencies, and see very little benefit with regard to blocking low
frequency sound.
> Hello, I would like to ask about the method of estimating STC values of
> double glazed windows.  E.g. I look up some textbook that a  "8mm-12mm air
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> CSL
bert stoltenborg - 05 Jul 2005 13:43 GMT
In the www.studiotips.com forum, the recording org, the john sayers
forum and the sos forum are a lot of threads about this, especially by
Eric Desart and Brian Ravnaas/Dayton.
It seems you have to rely on measurements, and even those show rather
large variations over different labs. Programs like Insul etc do not
come up with usable data.

> Hello, I would like to ask about the method of estimating STC values of
> double glazed windows.  E.g. I look up some textbook that a  "8mm-12mm air
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> CSL
Angelo Campanella - 05 Jul 2005 17:05 GMT
> It seems you have to rely on measurements, and even those show rather
> large variations over different labs. Programs like Insul etc do not
> come up with usable data.

It is next to impossible to compute the effective sound isolation of
most construction materials.

Only if the material is "limp" can it hope to obey the mass law.

Because construction materials must provide structural stiffness, they
will have resilient resonance modes. At each resonance mode, the sound
transmission is enhanced, and the transmission loss is very much less
than the mass law.

Because the frequency range of sound extends as much as ten octaves (up
to three decades), the possible modes of vibration are only this side of
infinity.

Mathematical models that take ALL of these resonances into consideration
do not yet exist in my experience. Mind you, the problem is three
dimensional, while most TL formulas are one dimensional. Where does that
lead us?

So you have two choices:

1- Forget about noise isolation. It's hopeless. everybody should wear
ANC earmuffs.

2- Build a full scale specimen of the assembly in question and measure
its noise reduction in a laboratory, or in a field test.

Your choice.

Angelo Campanella
CSL - 06 Jul 2005 02:46 GMT
Many thanks to Stewart and Campanella !! Actually,  I also dont want to use
some complex methods for predicting the resulted STC ... I just want some
simple ones ( Now, it seems hopeless, right ).  Now, I can save time in
searching models and go for searching test data instead.  Thanks again.

"Angelo Campanella" <a.campanella@att.net>
???????:ydyye.389804$cg1.259671@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> It seems you have to rely on measurements, and even those show rather
>> large variations over different labs. Programs like Insul etc do not
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Angelo Campanella
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.