 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / November 2005Acoustic Audio Engineer Job vacancy
ACOUSTIC Engineer JOB DESCRIPTION As one of our acoustic engineers you will work in Smart System Sound, Inc. Audio Manufacturing company which designs, develops and manufactures worlds best Audio sound speakers in Car, home Theatre and Commercial fields As an Acoustics Engineer, your role will be to conceive and develop advanced loudspeaker drivers for these premium, custom designed automotive sound systems. In order to accomplish this, you will: * Work closely with our research and manufacturing organizations to insure the optimization of performance and quality of all Automotive Systems transducers. * Evaluate appropriate new technologies and design cost effective,manufacturable products. * Oversee validation testing, analyze acoustical and mechanical measurements, and coordinate efforts between engineering manufacturing and/or vendors. *Engineer would also need to understand desig Amps, Source Unit, etc. and will also handle all Trainings Qualifications: ·MS with specific courses in acoustics in audio acoustics field (loudspeakers and audio transducers) ·Deep knowledge of the generation, propagation and perception of sound ·Excellence in analysis and design of novel audio devices ·Experience with audio and acoustics design and measurement techniques ·Experience with loudspeaker driver modeling (linear and non- linear), FEA Experience in understanding the relationship between mechanical and acoustical properties of structures and materials Critical listening skills, and ability to conduct analytical If you think you can handle above all mentioned details.... we can appoint as our engineer .. send us your C.V/Resume to mqadirullah@sssound.net E job- Indians Prefered Best wishes Smart system sound,Inc. http://sssound.net M.qadirullah [snip] >E job- Indians Prefered [snip] Do you realize that you've just broken the law in the United States, and probably many of the other countries in which your post appears? I don't know if the charter for this group specifically prohibits ethnic discrimination, but I'm sure it's not tolerated. Ken Plotkin > [snip] >>E job- Indians Prefered [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I don't know if the charter for this group specifically prohibits > ethnic discrimination, but I'm sure it's not tolerated. I agree with Ken that we inthe US no longer are privelged to limit applicants. I'm sure Abdullah was not aware of this detail. One thing not stated is where the applicant is obliged or preferred to be living while working. If it is in India, then it is fair to say so. > One thing not stated is where the applicant is obliged or preferred to be living while working. If it is in India, then it is > fair to say so. Do you mean that if the job is in India, it's ok to so specify? If so, is it ok to specify "English people preferred" for a job based in England? Believe me, that wouldn't be allowed here. As long as they can speak the language and are competent to perform the job, they should be eligible, no matter where they're from, as long as they are allowed to work in England. You just can't write "English people preferred" in a job advert here. Martin  SignatureM.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie >>One thing not stated is where the applicant is obliged or preferred to be living while working. If it is in India, then it is >>fair to say so. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > matter where they're from, as long as they are allowed to work in England. > You just can't write "English people preferred" in a job advert here. Quibble, quibble. And this offical quibbling, and more, is why the jobs drift elsewhere. Angelo Campanella >Quibble, quibble. Pointing out that discrimination is wrong is quibbling??? >And this offical quibbling, and more, is why the jobs drift elsewhere. Yes - to countries with no concept of human rights. > Pointing out that discrimination is wrong is quibbling??? Clearly, we have to be specific about which country will be the venue for hire, and which country for work. This indeterminacy is a result of the international nature of these news groups. > Yes - to countries with no concept of human rights. I like to think that in this case, the person that wrote the job description simply did not provide enough information. One certainly has to wonder why, exactly, Indians are preferred. My conclusion is that insufficient information was given to demonstrate intentional discrimination, so I withhold criticism (except for expecting better details). Sincerely, Angelo Campanella >>Quibble, quibble. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Yes - to countries with no concept of human rights. I'm sorry but the last one just made me laugh. A country which holds persons without a right to lawyers, without even knowing the charges for which these persons are held, tries telling the world about human rights. Sorry, is it still a surprise the US is considered one of the greatest terrorist states in the world by many. For goodness sakes, the state still indulges in murder AKA the Death Penalty. MalcolmX [snip] > One thing not stated is where the applicant is obliged or preferred to >be living while working. If it is in India, then it is fair to say so. I think the "E job" bit means that he's looking for someone in India who will work remotely, presumably at a lower salary than someone in a western country. That in itself is just one of those things that comes with global economy and free trade. No different than when the textile mills moved from New England to the Carolinas. But - if that's the case he should be running his ad in the location he wants to hire, not world wide. And he still should not be specifying a nationality. Ken Plotkin Indian? Maybe he means Cherokee, Apache, Arapaho, Seminole, Ute <g> Still it is discrimination. >Indian? Maybe he means Cherokee, Apache, Arapaho, Seminole, Ute <g> >Still it is discrimination. Could be. I'm not familiar enough with Native American names, though, to figure which tribe Abdullah might be from. :-) > But - if that's the case he should be running his ad in the location > he wants to hire, not world wide. And he still should not be > specifying a nationality. Perhaps it was nationality. That seems a perfectly normal and acceptable discrimination. There are lots of US jobs requiring US citizenship. What's wrong with an Indian company wanting Indian employees? Even if unsaid, age discrimination is so ubiquitous and undetectable, that I'd rather see it said to avoid wasting time. Bob Signature"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein >Perhaps it was nationality. That seems a perfectly normal and >acceptable discrimination. There are lots of US jobs requiring US >citizenship. I don't think I've ever seen that requirement outside of defense or other security-related jobs. >What's wrong with an Indian company wanting Indian employees? And advertising internationally for them? Digging through their site, that outfit appears to have a presence in India, the US and the UK. >Even if unsaid, age discrimination is so ubiquitous and undetectable, >that I'd rather see it said to avoid wasting time. Not an unreasonable position. And, if I were about to buy some audio gear, that ad gave me one less company to consider. Ken Plotkin |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.