Sometimes I set up a sound level meter(Rion) as Leq , A weighting ,
Slow(time constant) , measuring time 10sec.
When Leq (A-weighting, Slow, 10sec) and Lp (A-weighting, Slow, 10 sec
average) results are compared, are they same?
Noral Stewart - 18 Jan 2006 12:32 GMT
Leq as rigorously defined does not include use of any exponential time
weighting such as slow. However, some meters will sample a slow or fast
response level and compute an Leq from that. In most circumstances the
results should be essentially the same. If a meter offers two different
options that appear to be the same, I would look closely at the definitions.
The "average" Lp may be defined by the manufacturer differently from the
Leq. Check the instrument manual.
> Sometimes I set up a sound level meter(Rion) as Leq , A weighting ,
> Slow(time constant) , measuring time 10sec.
>
> When Leq (A-weighting, Slow, 10sec) and Lp (A-weighting, Slow, 10 sec
> average) results are compared, are they same?
CSL - 20 Jan 2006 07:49 GMT
Use 'Slow' time weighting:
1. When standards so state
2. For the measurement of steady state noises such as fans or compressors
Use 'Fast' time weighting:
1. When standards so state
2. For the measurement of variable or fluctuating noise levels such as
traffic
In "Slow" mode, about 10 data averaging within 10secs. I believe,
Lp(instaneous,Slow) result is similar to Leq(10sec,Slow) result if and only
if the noise source is relatively steady.
CSLL
<kifuyu@gmail.com>
???????:1137586894.401765.122570@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Sometimes I set up a sound level meter(Rion) as Leq , A weighting ,
> Slow(time constant) , measuring time 10sec.
>
> When Leq (A-weighting, Slow, 10sec) and Lp (A-weighting, Slow, 10 sec
> average) results are compared, are they same?