Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / June 2006

Art Ludwig is a seasoned, highly credentialed and highly respected
scientist, mathematician and engineer.  If anyone has any doubt about his
mathematical prowess, they should take a look at his website
http://www.silcom.com/~aludwig/

On the other hand, Bob Cain is an arrogant, narcissistic, self-appointed
authority on everything, and expert on nothing  Bob Cain's only claim to
fame is his prolific record of newsgroup posts, which tend to be
technically incorrect, more often than not.

During the past five years, Bob Cain has been on a persistent and
relentless campagn of posting defamatory comments about me on the internet.  
The fact that he continues to bestow me with his defamatory hominem attacks
should be of no surprise to anyone.  

While one may have thought that Bob Cain had long ago hit rock bottom on
the ethics/morality scale, Bob Cain has proven that not to be the case, as
is evidenced by his recent post of 5/24/2006 (copied/pasted verbatim
below), in which he arrogantly refers to Art Ludwig's math as "a hash job
with no merit."  



Gary Sokolich wrote:

"I have" obviously means something to Sokolich different from what is
commonly meant by it.  He will provide a link to what he has done to
show what assumption I have made and how it violates anything.

in

It is a hash job with no merit.  From the quality of it I believe Gary
Sokolich wrote it as well as the crap he quoted.  Sokolich has a
history of impersonation that is well known.

Dokolich does not have the ability or he would have used it counter or
refute the technical result I arrived at.  To prove otherwise he will
post his own analysis to show that he understands the problem and its
solution.

Sokolich said nothing that he could be objectively right or wrong
about.  He is very careful about that in everything he writes.

(He seems to have slipped and tripped himself up recently, however, by
stating unequivocally that tube amps with transformer outputs have no
problems with open circuit loads.)

It is not necessary to provide any solutions to any partial
differential equations to analyze this problem other than the standard
solution to the acoustic plane wave.  That Sokolich claims otherwise
demonstrates either obfuscation or ignorance.

This is all I have to say on the subject (this time 'round) until and
unless he puts some meat on the bones of his contentions.

Bob