Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / June 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Noise monitoruing during Lunch breaks

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
estudioacustico@terra.cl - 30 May 2006 18:05 GMT
I need opinions about if neccesary take noise measurements during
lunch, for worker dosimetry. I read a paper that said that in this time
the measurement unit had to be paused. In my experience, lunch time is
quieter than work time, then, isn´t relevant for results.
Thanks
Ergonaut - 30 May 2006 18:13 GMT
estudioacustico@terra.cl wrote in news:1149008730.261511.151320
@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> I need opinions about if neccesary take noise measurements during
> lunch, for worker dosimetry. I read a paper that said that in this time
> the measurement unit had to be paused. In my experience, lunch time is
> quieter than work time, then, isn´t relevant for results.
> Thanks

In my experience that's when the workers go out to their vehicles and crank
up the tune while they eat their lunch! You want the daily dose and if
necessary you may or may not include the time allotted for breaks.
Peter Davis
Faszer Farquharson & Associates Ltd.
Tony - 30 May 2006 21:05 GMT
> estudioacustico@terra.cl wrote in news:1149008730.261511.151320
> @i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Peter Davis
> Faszer Farquharson & Associates Ltd.

Modern dosemeters give a time history of the noise exposure.  This is
essential unless you watch the people being monitored all the time.   For
various reasons, people might try to minimise or maximise the measured noise
exposure.  I have experience of both these, but a time history of the noise
will usually pick up anything odd going on, and will of course allow you to
separately account for the exposure during lunch break.

Signature

Tony Woolf
Tony Woolf Acoustics
17 Canfield Gardens, London NW6 3JP
Tel. 020 7624 2512  Fax 020 7372 3054

estudioacustico@terra.cl - 01 Jun 2006 03:27 GMT
> Modern dosemeters give a time history of the noise exposure.  This is
> essential unless you watch the people being monitored all the time.   For
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> 17 Canfield Gardens, London NW6 3JP
> Tel. 020 7624 2512  Fax 020 7372 3054

Hi Tony:
you are right, we work with dosemeters with datalogger. But we had some
problems with clients and collegues about that. But, i think, generally
lunch time, noise level are lower than work time, and these can be
ignored.
Noise Levels History is a very useful tool too.

Thanks and luck
Noral Stewart - 01 Jun 2006 12:35 GMT
If the sound exposure during the lunch is insignificant, then it will not
add to the dose, so the indicated dose for the day will be correct, and TWA
computed from that will be correct.  However, instruments also commonly show
an average level for the monitored period, and that level would be lower for
a period including a quiet lunch than for a shorter period without the quiet
lunch.

>> Modern dosemeters give a time history of the noise exposure.  This is
>> essential unless you watch the people being monitored all the time.   For
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Thanks and luck
Angelo Campanella - 09 Jun 2006 05:49 GMT
> estudioacustico@terra.cl wrote in news:1149008730.261511.151320
> @i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>>I need opinions about if neccesary take noise measurements during
>>lunch, for worker dosimetry. I read a paper that said that in this time
>>the measurement unit had to be paused. In my experience, lunch time is
>>quieter than work time, then, isn´t relevant for results.

The original intent of this overall procedure was to determine the
employer's liability in causing hearing damage resulting in hearing
loss. What the employee did on his or her own time (recreation, lunch,
home, etc.) was not a matter of concern to OSHA and the employer. Thus,
lunch break noise exposure was and still is not to be counted.

If you want to measure that separately, then do so.

The general pinion has been that this noise exposure is small and of
less concern. But as many point out, it is possible that the employee
can be exposed to significant sound levels during that time.

Ultimately, the measurement protocol referenced was aimed at producing
data that could be used for noise reduction design and implementation.
Thus, any off job task noise exposure becomes a red herring for noise
control engineering and test.

Angelo Campanula.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.