Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

perforated sheet

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
pedro - 13 Jul 2006 17:46 GMT
As a university work assignment I'm making a preliminary design of an
anechoic chamber.
I receive a suggestion from a technician to install the anechoic
materials (foam wedges)  in a rigid perforated metal sheet backed by a
porous material such as mineral wool.
As I understand, the absorption performance of the perforate will
depend only on the geometry (the hole radius and number of holes) and
not on the material.
Why use more expensive sheet metal perforated instead of hardboard or
plywood?
Thanks for help.
Tony - 13 Jul 2006 22:12 GMT
> As a university work assignment I'm making a preliminary design of an
> anechoic chamber.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Why use more expensive sheet metal perforated instead of hardboard or
> plywood?

Not quite sure how you intend to mount the wedges, but in answer to your
question, the acoustic performance of perforated sheet depends also on sheet
thickness.  The high frequency absorption decreases as sheet thickness
increases, particularly with small holes.

Signature

Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group.

Chris Whealy - 14 Jul 2006 08:19 GMT
> As a university work assignment I'm making a preliminary design of an anechoic chamber.
> I receive a suggestion from a technician to install the anechoic materials (foam wedges) in a rigid perforated metal sheet backed by a porous material such as mineral wool.
> As I understand, the absorption performance of the perforate will depend only on the geometry (the hole radius and number of holes) and not on the material.
> Why use more expensive sheet metal perforated instead of hardboard or plywood?

The theories that predict the impedance and resonant frequency of a
perforated sheet assume that the sheet itself is perfectly rigid and
therefore has no influence on acoustic behaviour.  If you used a metal
sheet, then it would be far more rigid than a plywood or hardboard
sheet, and therefore, the performance would be closer to the predicted
values.

The factors affecting the impedance of a perforated sheet are the hole
radius, the repeat distance between holes and the panel thickness.

As either the panel thickness, or the hole spacing increases, the high
end absorption drops off.  The high end absorption drops also off as the
hole radius decreases.

Have a look at my Porous Absorber Calculator spreadsheet that might help
you in this area. http://www.whealy.com/acoustics/Porous.html

Chris W

Signature

The voice of ignorance speaks loud and long,
But the words of the wise are quiet and few.
                                         ---

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.