>> Nope, it's a power thing, not a voltage level thing, and multiplying each
>>sample's level by .1 would alter the final voltage level of the amp driving
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> where you can more easily foist your ignorance as knowledge, becasue it
> won't fly here.
Not clear at all.
When multiplying a wave file, I interpret that the sound pressure level
created by the sound card varies directly as the wav amplitude. If it's
power, nobody here ever declared it to be.
In the predominance of such occasions, the amplitude expressed applies
to the voltage or the current applied to the PC loudspeaker the user's
earphone. In those cases, the sound pressure created is in proportion to
that voltage or current.
In that case, "multiplication by 0.1" causes the amplitude to be
diminished to 1/10th and hence the sound power emitted to be 1/100dth,
which is -20 dB, making the sound to appear to be 1/4 (half of half).
BTW, does you byline mean that you are purely imaginary?
Angelo Campanella
exp(j*pi/2) - 22 Sep 2006 22:14 GMT
> >> Nope, it's a power thing, not a voltage level thing, and multiplying each
> >>sample's level by .1 would alter the final voltage level of the amp driving
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> diminished to 1/10th and hence the sound power emitted to be 1/100dth,
> which is -20 dB, making the sound to appear to be 1/4 (half of half).
I agree with you. My point was that half loudness at mid frequencies
corresponds approximately to a decrease of 10dB in the signal, and that
it's a 10dB decrease irrespective of whether you are talking about
voltage, current or power. If you are talking about either voltage or
current, it's a decrease in a factor of 1/sart(10). If you are talking
about power, it's a decrease by a factor of 10.
> BTW, does you byline mean that you are purely imaginary?
It simply reflects the fact that I am in transition from being a
disembodied spirit, to being purely imaginary to being totally
anonymous.
Mike Rieves - 23 Sep 2006 02:39 GMT
> Not clear at all.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Angelo Campanella
Since a speaker will be reproducing the sound in the wave file,and a power
amp will be driving the speaker, my understanding is that in order to
provide a 6 dB increase in SPL, it will require a 6 dB increase in amplifier
power, is this not correct? Since P= E2/R or I2R, a 6dB increase in voltage
or current would result in a 16 fold increase in amplifier power.
The case of an earphone is considerably different from the case on a
speaker in open air, since the earphone is firing into a very small totally
enclosed space and the speaker is firinf into a large open space.
exp(j*pi/2) - 23 Sep 2006 03:03 GMT
> > Not clear at all.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> speaker in open air, since the earphone is firing into a very small totally
> enclosed space and the speaker is firinf into a large open space.
You are undisputedly "The Ultimate Techncial Ignoramus." Every time
you open your mouth (post) you reveal even more of the unbouned depth
of your technical ignorance.
Angelo Campanella - 23 Sep 2006 06:05 GMT
> Since a speaker will be reproducing the sound in the wave file,and a power
> amp will be driving the speaker, my understanding is that in order to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> speaker in open air, since the earphone is firing into a very small totally
> enclosed space and the speaker is firinf into a large open space.
Somebody give Mike a crash course...
better make that a comprehensive course...
on decibel math.
Angelo Campanella