Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Acoustics / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

novice: loudness of a wav

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
aine_canby@yahoo.com - 20 Sep 2006 17:04 GMT
Hi,

If i multiply each sample in my wav file by 0.1, will my wav file sound
half as loud?

Thanks,

Aine
Don Pearce - 20 Sep 2006 17:06 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Aine

No, you need to use something more like 0.3 for that (roughly 10dB,
0.1 would give you 20dB)

d

Signature

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com

Mike Rieves - 21 Sep 2006 01:31 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Aine

 Nope, it's a power thing, not a voltage level thing, and multiplying each
sample's level by .1 would alter the final voltage level of the  amp driving
the speakers. You'd need to calculate for -10dB power levels. In any event
the 10dB thing is both subjective and relative and varies by the frequency
of the tone as well as the initial loudness. In some cases a difference of
6dB will result in an apparent doubling or halving of the perceived
loudness.
exp(j*pi/2) - 21 Sep 2006 02:53 GMT
>   Nope, it's a power thing, not a voltage level thing, and multiplying each
> sample's level by .1 would alter the final voltage level of the  amp driving
> the speakers. You'd need to calculate for -10dB power levels.

Nonsense!  -10dB is -10dB, period, and you are obviously clueless about
the subject matter about which you pretend to be knowledgeable.
Perhaps you should stick to posting your drivel alt.music.home-studio
where you can more easily foist your ignorance as knowledge, becasue it
won't fly here.
Angelo Campanella - 22 Sep 2006 20:52 GMT
>>  Nope, it's a power thing, not a voltage level thing, and multiplying each
>>sample's level by .1 would alter the final voltage level of the  amp driving
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> where you can more easily foist your ignorance as knowledge, becasue it
> won't fly here.

Not clear at all.

When multiplying a wave file, I interpret that the sound pressure level
created by the sound card varies directly as the wav amplitude. If it's
power, nobody here ever declared it to be.

In the predominance of such occasions, the amplitude expressed applies
to the voltage or the current applied to the PC loudspeaker the user's
earphone. In those cases, the sound pressure created is in proportion to
that voltage or current.

In that case, "multiplication by 0.1" causes the amplitude to be
diminished to 1/10th and hence the sound power emitted to be 1/100dth,
which is -20 dB, making the sound to appear to be 1/4 (half of half).

BTW, does you byline mean that you are purely imaginary?

Angelo Campanella
exp(j*pi/2) - 22 Sep 2006 22:14 GMT
> >>  Nope, it's a power thing, not a voltage level thing, and multiplying each
> >>sample's level by .1 would alter the final voltage level of the  amp driving
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> diminished to 1/10th and hence the sound power emitted to be 1/100dth,
> which is -20 dB, making the sound to appear to be 1/4 (half of half).

I agree with you.  My point was that half loudness at mid frequencies
corresponds approximately to a decrease of 10dB in the signal, and that
it's a 10dB decrease irrespective of whether you are talking about
voltage, current or power.  If you are talking about either voltage or
current, it's a decrease in a factor of 1/sart(10).  If you are talking
about power, it's  a decrease by a factor of 10.

> BTW, does you byline mean that you are purely imaginary?

It simply reflects the fact that I am in transition from being a
disembodied spirit, to being purely imaginary to being totally
anonymous.
Mike Rieves - 23 Sep 2006 02:39 GMT
> Not clear at all.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Angelo Campanella

 Since a speaker will be reproducing the sound in the wave file,and a power
amp will be driving the speaker, my understanding is that in order to
provide a 6 dB increase in SPL, it will require a 6 dB increase in amplifier
power, is this not correct? Since P= E2/R or I2R, a 6dB increase in voltage
or current would result in a 16 fold increase in amplifier power.
  The case of an earphone is considerably different from the case on a
speaker in open air, since the earphone is firing into a very small totally
enclosed space and the speaker is firinf into a large open space.
exp(j*pi/2) - 23 Sep 2006 03:03 GMT
> > Not clear at all.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> speaker in open air, since the earphone is firing into a very small totally
> enclosed space and the speaker is firinf into a large open space.

You are undisputedly "The Ultimate Techncial Ignoramus."  Every time
you open your mouth (post) you reveal even more of the unbouned depth
of your  technical ignorance.
Angelo Campanella - 23 Sep 2006 06:05 GMT
>   Since a speaker will be reproducing the sound in the wave file,and a power
> amp will be driving the speaker, my understanding is that in order to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> speaker in open air, since the earphone is firing into a very small totally
> enclosed space and the speaker is firinf into a large open space.

Somebody give Mike a crash course...
better make that a comprehensive course...
on decibel math.

Angelo Campanella
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.