Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / February 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NMR and X-ray : relative qualities

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
chuaby@hotmail.com - 27 Feb 2007 04:26 GMT
Hi

I am trying to learn about NMR and X-Ray to find out protein 3D
structures. I have read from the web that the results from NMR and  X-
Ray could be quite different. But i do not have access to some papers
that discuss about this.

I read that NMR cannot handle large protein well but X-ray requires
protein to be crystal form. I wish to get a feel from practitioners
what are the relative qualities of each structure determined by these
2 methods ? presuming testing on a same protein. which results to
believe ?

Thank you
Best Regards
Boon Yiang
Bob - 28 Feb 2007 02:21 GMT
>Hi
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>2 methods ? presuming testing on a same protein. which results to
>believe ?

It's not a matter of quality or "which to believe". They measure
different things. X-ray analysis measures whatever you got into the
crystal. NMR measures whatever you measured.

Recent article -- Feb 8 issue of Nature --  on NMR with a large
protein (670 KD):

Quantitative dynamics and binding studies of the 20S proteasome by NMR
pp618 - 622
By overcoming the molecular weight limitations that have traditionally
hampered quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR)
studies, the dynamics of the 670-kilodalton 20S proteasome core
particle
have been explored. A selective isotope labelling scheme along with
experiments that preserve the lifetimes of the resulting NMR signals
reveal functionally important motions and interactions by recording
spectra on complexes with molecular weights up to 1 MDa.
Remco Sprangers and Lewis E. Kay
10.1038/nature05512
Abstract:
http://ealerts.nature.com/cgi-bin24/DM/y/ecQN0SpWd30HjB0BLkz0EH

+ News story
Structural biology: Molecular machinery in action p609
Nuclear magnetic resonance is the best way to study motion in
proteins, but it could be applied only to small systems. This
limitation has been overcome to reveal the dynamics of a large
protein complex.
Ad Bax and Dennis A. Torchia
10.1038/nature05566
http://ealerts.nature.com/cgi-bin24/DM/y/ecQN0SpWd30HjB0BLkr0E8

Article descriptions above are from Nature TOC.

bob
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.