via bbc news
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6547675.stm
Sperm made from human bone marrow
Scientists say they have successfully made immature sperm cells from
human bone marrow samples.
If these can be grown into fully developed sperm, which the
researchers hope to do within five years, they may be useful in
fertility treatments.
But experts have warned the findings from the German study should be
interpreted with caution at this very early stage.
And proposed new laws would ban their use in fertility treatments in
the UK.
The government's recent fertility White Paper proposes a ban on using
artificially created sperm or eggs in assisted reproduction.
The researchers from the Universities of Göttingen and Münster and the
Medical School of Hannover isolated adult stem cells - cells that have
the ability to become many types of tissue in the body - from bone
marrow samples taken from male volunteers.
Spermatagonial cells
Normally these stem cells from the bone marrow would develop into the
different cell types in muscle tissue.
But the researchers induced a small number of them to develop into
what appeared to be spermatagonial cells - cells found in the testes
which would normally develop into mature sperm cells.
This is the first time human spermatagonial cells have been made
artificially in this way.
And lead researcher Professor Karim Nayernia, now at the North-east
England Stem Cell Institute based at the Centre for Life in Newcastle
upon Tyne, said he hopes his investigations will mean he might one day
be able to treat young men rendered infertile by chemotherapy.
He said: "We're very excited about this discovery.
"Our next goal is to see if we can get the spermatagonial cells to
progress to mature sperm in the laboratory and this should take around
three to five years of experiments."
*
Very interesting indeed, although we hardly need ways
to breed MORE people. Far too many already, far too
many more soon to come. The planet is only just SO
big you know.
However this does illustrate just how versatile stem
cells can be, even non-embryonic varieties. Research
like this that explores the mechanisms, possibilities
and limits of stem cells will be of immense value to
millions, maybe billions, a few years down the road.
In the meanwhile, it is not unreasonable to ban the
use of faux-sperm for fertility treatments. They may
prove to be perfectly normal and functional, or they
may have odd genetic quirks.
The best form for the law would be as a renewable
moratorium, something that has to come up for a vote
every three or four years. If the sperm are viable,
just do nothing and let the law sunset into oblivion.
This approach makes sense for a large variety of
bio-tech issues and is superior to a situation where
a vote is necessary to eliminate the law - since
political and religious extremists might apply undue
pressure to block such a move despite general public
opinion or medical need. Politicians will get far
less trouble over doing nothing, letting the law
expire, than they would for doing something by
voting against it.
Dave - 14 Apr 2007 01:31 GMT
> via bbc newshttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6547675.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> expire, than they would for doing something by
> voting against it.
Have these sperm cells had a process of meiosis, or are they like half
a clone?
Here is a bit of what I hope will remain sci-fi:
For a while now I have been wondering about accelerating human
evolution, by harvesting gametes from embyros. I heard that eggs were
produced in the foetus, and now if you don't need to wait for a male
to mature, you could produce sperm from the embryo.
There could be advantages here if you could test a foetus for markers
of intelligence. Hopefully you could get a generation down to like 4
months, and if you could select for a 0.5% improvement in
intelligence, then in 20 years you could get about a 33% improvement.
Then a fully grown human could be produced. The accelerated
generations may rely on gestation tanks, though, for economy.