Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is religion a breeding program?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Viator - 18 Nov 2007 17:34 GMT
Hi folks,

I have a very tiny kettle of fish to open up.

To what extent do religions act as breeding programs?

Do religions compete for maximal population count
of followers?

If so, is their doing so equivalent to eugenics i.e.
does it impact the genome?

What evidence is there that religious groups
deliberately influence breeding behaviors or
match people up or influence the number of
children?

Which came first, the culture that tells people to
have large numbers of children or the religion
that stands to benefit from having more believers?

Interesting article:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0825-02.htm

Thanks.
Ken - 18 Nov 2007 17:57 GMT
> Hi folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Thanks.

As several poiunts of evidence, catholics don't believe in birth
control or abortion, morman's love large families, and brainwashed
fundy xtians want lots of kids to support their stupid religious
delusions.
Roger Coppock - 18 Nov 2007 22:32 GMT
> > I have a very tiny kettle of fish to open up.

There is nothing small about your kettle of fish.
There be sea monsters in that kettle, matey!

> > To what extent do religions act as breeding programs?
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> fundy xtians want lots of kids to support their stupid religious
> delusions.

There are also religious practices and groups that
limit breeding.  Seen any Shakers lately?  Please see:

http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/Shakers.html

Besides numerical, here are other religious effects
on breeding too.  Families of 18th century American
religious communists, (like the Amish,) starting in
the early 20th century were encouraged to marry
outside the faith to control inbreeding.  Religion
also enforces castes, which creates isolated
breeding pools.
Bill Habr - 18 Nov 2007 19:06 GMT
> Hi folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Thanks.

Pre-industrial societies and early industrial societies depended on manpower for food
production and defense. A society that did not produce more people would either be
conquered or absorbed by those that did produce more people. Since most religions were
tied to a single society there was no reason to preach that religion in order to "benefit
from having more believers" but rather for the society's protection.
Michael Gray - 18 Nov 2007 23:34 GMT
>Hi folks,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Do religions compete for maximal population count
>of followers?

Most do.
The Shakers didn't.

>If so, is their doing so equivalent to eugenics i.e.
>does it impact the genome?

I have no idea of what you mean by this nebulous query.

>What evidence is there that religious groups
>deliberately influence breeding behaviors or
>match people up or influence the number of
>children?

The RCC official policies on breeding is the most popular form of
regulation on reproduction.
The Amish also have very strict breeding rules.
There are countless other examples.

>Which came first, the culture that tells people to
>have large numbers of children or the religion
>that stands to benefit from having more believers?

The culture IS the religion and vice-versa.
Again, I have difficulty parsing your question.

>Interesting article:
>http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0825-02.htm
>
>Thanks.
Ron Peterson - 20 Nov 2007 04:23 GMT
> Do religions compete for maximal population count
> of followers?

Yes, if they want to be successful.

> If so, is their doing so equivalent to eugenics i.e.
> does it impact the genome?

No. Religions don't depend on a person's DNA.

> What evidence is there that religious groups
> deliberately influence breeding behaviors or
> match people up or influence the number of
> children?

Rev. Moon does something like that.

> Which came first, the culture that tells people to
> have large numbers of children or the religion
> that stands to benefit from having more believers?

The number of followers is how religions are measured.

--
  Ron
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.