Forgive for asking this inane question, but why has
NASA chosen not to land a rover on either of the Martian Poles?
thanks,
mike
Moontanman - 27 Jan 2004 05:30 GMT
>Forgive for asking this inane question, but why has
>NASA chosen not to land a rover on either of the Martian Poles?
>thanks,
>mike
It may have had to do with the europeons trying it this year too but their
rover failed and NASA's had already been lanched.
Moon
remove nospam from e-mail to send to me, I grow trees in aquariums like bonsai.
I breed dwarf crayfish, great for planted community tanks. If you can get me a
shovelnose sturgeon fingerling (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus) no wild caught
please, contact me
Mr. 4X - 28 Jan 2004 22:13 GMT
> Forgive for asking this inane question, but why has
> NASA chosen not to land a rover on either of the Martian Poles?
Sunlight. The mars rovers run on solar batteries.
> thanks,
> mike