Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mars Question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mike - 25 Jan 2004 19:36 GMT
Forgive for asking this inane question, but why has
NASA chosen not to land a rover on either of the Martian Poles?
thanks,
mike
Moontanman - 27 Jan 2004 05:30 GMT
>Forgive for asking this inane question, but why has
>NASA chosen not to land a rover on either of the Martian Poles?
>thanks,
>mike

It may have had to do with the europeons trying it this year too but their
rover failed and NASA's had already been lanched.

Moon
remove nospam from e-mail to send to me, I grow trees in aquariums like bonsai.
I breed dwarf crayfish, great for planted community tanks.  If you can get me a
shovelnose sturgeon fingerling (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus) no wild caught
please, contact me
Mr. 4X - 28 Jan 2004 22:13 GMT
> Forgive for asking this inane question, but why has
> NASA chosen not to land a rover on either of the Martian Poles?

Sunlight. The mars rovers run on solar batteries.

> thanks,
> mike
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.