Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / April 2008

A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence
of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects
which in past were called "holy", and attributes of other similar
substances or objects which were NOT considered to be holy. For
example, let us consider attributes of such "holy" substances and
objects, as: (1) "daily bread" (by the Christian religion considered
to be a representation of the body of Christ), (2) "coconuts", (3)
"drinking water" (by first Christians used for christening, while by
pagans utilised in water dowsing), (4) "red wine" (considered to
represent the blood of Jesus). If one compares their attributes with
attributes of other very similar substances or objects, e.g. with
attributes of: (1n) white bread or buns, (2n) fruits of tropical
durian, (3n) undrinkable water, (4n) white wine, then outcomes of this
comparison become very meaningful. Namely, it then turns out that
everything that in past was described as "holy" actually displays
attributes which are beneficial to people at many levels, and which do
NOT introduce any side effects. In turn everything that was NOT
considered holy shows also various attributes that are undesirable for
humans - in spite that in almost every aspect it is similar to a
related holy substance or object. For example, in spite that the
"daily bread" and the "white bread" are baked in a similar manner and
from almost the same flour, differences between their consequences for
health of people are huge. Similarly, in spite that "red wine" and
"white wine" are produced through the same process from almost the
same grapes which grew on exactly the same soil, their influences onto
drinking people are very different. In fact these differences in
attributes of whatever in past (and sometimes also today) was called
"holy", from attributes of whatever is NOT considered to be holy,
cannot be justify exclusively with the use of findings and knowledge
of present "atheistic" science. So let us now provide here several
most meaningful examples of extraordinary attributes of something that
in past was considered to be "holy". In order to shorten the
discussion, below is analysed only a single attribute which does NOT
appear in similar substances and objects that are NOT considered to be
holy. But independently from the attribute discussed below, each
substance and object mentioned below displays also a whole range of
further extraordinary attributes which are very difficult to justify
by present atheistic science. So here are these examples:

(1) Irreplaceable attributes of the holy "daily bread". As we know the
humanity invented a large variety of dishes which are made of flour.
To such dishes belong: buns, cakes, pancakes, macaroons, dumplings,
etc., etc. But only the so-called "daily bread" was considered in past
to be holy. This "daily bread" used to be wholegrain bread, baked from
the unsifted wholemeal rye flour. The dough for this bread was
fermented before baking in a similar manner like until present time
are fermented the Japanese "miso" and Korean "kimchi" (for
descriptions of Korean "kim-chi" - see item #B1  from the web page
"korea.htm" - about the mysterious, fascinating, moral, and
progressive Korea). In the result of this fermentation, the daily
bread become black like the soil from which it grew, and thus
considered to be "too common" for wealthy people. Only this bread in
old times was treated with the highest respect and worshiped as holy.
White bread, buns, cakes, and other products made of flour, were NOT
considered to be "holy". In fact I still remember until today from
Poland of the times of my childhood, means Poland of 1950s, such
manifestations of the respect to "daily bread" which were still
practiced then. For example, at that time people used to say sorry to,
and to kiss, a slice of bread when they accidentally allowed it to
fall to the floor. Old-timers never threw away to rubbish even
smallest crumbs of bread. Furthermore, to express their respect to
this bread, men used to take hats off their heads for the duration of
eating - even in most cold days. As present people discovered this,
the formerly "holy" daily bread in fact displays attributes that
deserve the holiness. For example, eating this bread in any quantities
does NOT bring any undesirable consequences to the human health. (On
the other hand eating large amounts of any other products made from
flour turns out to be unhealthy.) Furthermore, people can survive by
eating exclusively this holy "daily bread", while they cannot survive
by eating exclusively any other dish made of flour.

(2) The fact that coconuts never fall on heads of people, in spite
that in light of statistics there should be cases of falling coconuts
hitting some people in heads. As I explained this on a separate web
page "fruit.htm" - about tropical fruits from the area of Pacific, "in
many tropical countries coconut palms are considered to be 'holy
trees'" which were designed especially by God to satisfy all basic
needs of people. (Notice that the holiness of coconuts is recognised
in there in a similar manner as in old Europe the holiness of "daily
bread" was practiced.) The holiness of coconut palms proves itself
because e.g. on small oceanic islands, on which is NOT growing
anything else apart from this palm, in fact coconut palms are
providers of everything. In some religions, e.g. Hinduism, gods
receive gifts from coconuts. The Bible says that palm branches were
placed in front of walking Jesus. This holiness of coconut palms is
there also a source of the deep belief which prevails in countries in
which coconuts grow, namely that in order to NOT harm people heavy
"coconuts never fall onto heads of humans". Actually in many tropical
countries, e.g. in Malaysia, locals are saying that "coconut palms
have eyes" - thus they never drop a coconut on heads of humans. I
personally was very intrigued by this belief. So whenever I had an
opportunity to visit an area where coconut palms grow, I always asked
locals whether they know a case that a coconut fell on someone's head.
I must confirm here, that in spite of my wide and many years long
asking "I never encountered a case that someone knew someone else on
the head of whom a coconut fell". Such a case would be quite well-
known, because the large weight of coconuts combined with the
significant height of coconut palms, would cause that the fell of a
coconut on someone's head would kill such unfortunate person. Of
course, this lack of cases when coconuts fall on human heads is
something extraordinary and it should be explained by the "holiness"
of the palm. After all, other (non-holy) trees drop their fruits
completely at random, in this on human heads. I myself remember a case
when a falling apple hit me in the head - fortunately was ripe and
soft. In Malaysia grows a tasty fruit which just has a size of
coconuts - it is called "durian". It is commonly known there, that at
the time of durians' ripening, people should either keep far from
these trees, or wear protective "hard hats". This is because heavy
durian fruits fall "at random", including onto human heads. So it is
nothing unusual to hear over there about cases of people getting hit
by durian fruits.

Regrettably, someone clearly could NOT stand this extraordinary
attribute of "holy palms" and decided to include also the holy
coconuts into the "scientific atheism". Namely, that someone started
to spread on the behalf of science the untrue claims that supposedly
in the world every year dies from falling coconuts as much as 150
people. These claims make falling coconuts hypothetically even more
dangerous than attacks of sharks. Such false claims were disseminated
in so organised manner, that on their base various insurance companies
started to develop their "coconut policies". Fortunately for the
truth, some scientists decided to get to the bottom of the "research"
on which the coconut deaths claims were based. Outcomes of their
research were summarised later, amongst others, in the article "Lies,
damn lies, and 150 coconut deaths" from page B9 of the New Zealand
newspaper named "Weekend Herald", issue dated on Saturday, April 12,
2008. Searches of these scientists revealed, that the claims were made
up in Australia in 2002. Only then were disseminated all over the
world by an article in Daily Telegraph. At the beginning these claims
referred to the publication of a Canadian professor, in which there
was NO quantitative data on this subject, while the professor himself
denied that he ever accumulated such quantitative data. Thus, in spite
of the lies spread on this subject under a smoke screen of the
official science, in fact coconuts never fall down on heads of people.

(3) The holy river Ganges in India belongs to the most biologically
polluted rivers of the world. But Hindu devotes drink water directly
from the river. In spite of this, Hindu who believe in holiness of
this river never report an illness acquired by drinking biologically
polluted water of this river.

(3) All 12 Apostles drank wine from the same cup. But the Bible does
NOT report that any Apostle acquired an illness passed around due to
this drinking of all of them from the same cup.

The described above documentation for the existence of extraordinary
attributes (which cannot be justified nor explained on the basis of
atheistic science) in all substances and objects acknowledged as
"holy", was adopted from item #F2 from the web page named "bible.htm",
update of 14 April 2008, or later. In turn descriptions and legends
concerning coconuts and fruits of durian discussed above are presented
in items #1 and #4 from the totaliztic web page "fruit.htm" about
tropical fruits from the area of Pacific, update of 15 April 2008, or
later. The web page "fruit.htm" should be available from following
addresses ?if it was not sabotaged there by evil powers that recently
rampage in the internet and all over the Earth (probably these evil
powers are also responsible for organising the lies about 150 deaths
per year from coconuts):

http://bible.webng.com/fruit.htm
http://energy.atspace.org/fruit.htm
http://evidence.ueuo.com/fruit.htm
http://evil.thefreehost.biz/fruit.htm
http://fruit.sitesled.com/fruit.htm
http://fruit.xphost.org/fruit.htm
http://god.ez-sites.ws/fruit.htm
http://karma.freewebpages.org/fruit.htm
http://memorial.awardspace.info/fruit.htm
http://newzealand.myfreewebs.net/fruit.htm
http://nirvana.scienceontheweb.net/fruit.htm
http://pigs.freehyperspace.com/fruit.htm
http://parasitism.about.tc/fruit.htm
http://parasitism.xphost.org/fruit.htm
http://rubik.hits.io/fruit.htm
http://tornado.99k.org/fruit.htm
http://wszewilki.greatnow.com/fruit.htm

It is also worth to know that under each address indicated above ALL
the web pages of totalizm should be available (unless some of these
web pages were sabotaged in the meantime). Thus, if someone wishes to
view descriptions from any other web page of totalizm, e.g. from a web
page listed in this message, or listed in other totaliztic messages,
then in the above addresses the name "fruit.htm" is just enough to
exchange for a name of the web page that he or she wishes to view,
e.g. for the name of web page "boiler.htm", "free_energy.htm",
"wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm", "newzealand.htm", "free_energy.htm",
"fe_cell.htm", "malbork_uk.htm", "evolution.htm", "god.htm",
"bible.htm", "text_1_5.htm", "dipolar_gravity.htm", "nirvana.htm",
"evil.htm", "memorial.htm", etc., etc.

Topics related to matters discussed here are also presented on blogs
of totalizm which can be visited at addresses:
http://www.getablog.net/totalizm
http://totalizm.wordpress.com
http://totalizm.myblog.net
http://www.newfreehost.com/weblog/?u=god

Wi the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak

Motto: "Everything that is recognised to be 'holy' displays various
attributes which just cannot be explained on basis of atheistic
science."

P.S. The subject of the scientific "evidence for the existence of God"
described here, as well as other subjects related to it, is already
being discussed on various Google discussion groups. For example:

(1) The discussion of the absolute lack of scientific evidence for the
non-existence of God is carried out at the internet addresses:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/20892864b7f7690e
/bbdc5b3dc1aed298#bbdc5b3dc1aed298

(2) The discussion of the biological evidence for the existence of
God, is carried out at addresses:
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/8040cef26d37261
f#de22942cb8fe3aee

(3) The discussion of the physical evidence for the existence of God
is carried out at the internet addresses:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/0b85905d2dc9f083
#c374dc041f3c5fdf