On PBS TV is a one minute clip (PBS is not supposed to have commercial
ads). Anyway, the
clip shows a want-to-be opera singer. So what he does is have a whole
bunch of "still photos"
taken of him in various singing positions of a opera song. And then he
fastens them all together
into a booklet. A booklet of still photos and then he is able to hold
the booklet and with his thumb
is able to riffle through the stack of still photos and by doing so,
it looks like a "motion picture".
So, with one still photo, time stands still and no action, but when
you riffle through a stack of
still photos, we have the appearance of a motion picture and the
appearance of a time sequence.
This is perhaps one of my very best science analogies because to
explain "Time itself" as a
physics entity, well, that is ultimate physics.
In Newtonian Mechanics, one of the reasons it is false physics is
because time has no direction
in Newtonian Mechanics. We can look at a motion picture of several
frames of a billiard ball
table and cannot tell whether those select few frames are going
forward or going in reverse.
Likewise in the Big Bang and Big Crunch theory. However, in the Atom
Totality theory we
can instantly tell the time and the direction from looking at just one
still photo of the Cosmos.
Now I spoke of the concept of Extension in previous post where I said
that if Darwin Evolution
theory axioms did not have Newtonian Mechanics, free-will, choice,
probabilities, then Darwin
axioms could be considered a Extension of Superdeterminism, and thus
saving Darwin
Evolution as a subset of Superdeterminism. But I also said that Darwin
Evolution theory is
hopelessly entangled with Probability and Choice and Free-Will and
Newtonian Mechanics that
it could not be a subset of Superdeterminism and thus saved as a true
theory.
Newtonian Mechanics is smaller than Time. Newtonian Mechanics is a
subset of time.
Darwin Evolution theory is smaller than Time. Darwin Evolution theory
is a subset of time.
Now in the previous posts I quoted what John Bell gave as a definition
of Superdeterminism
and it bears repeating here:
--- quoting John Bell of 1985 to the BBC---
There is a way to escape the inference of superluminal speeds and
spooky action at a distance. But it involves absolute determinism
in the universe, the complete absence of free will. Suppose the
world is super-deterministic, with not just inanimate nature running
on behind-the-scenes clockwork, but with our behavior, including our
belief that we are free to choose to do one experiment rather than
another, absolutely predetermined, including the "decision" by the
experimenter to carry out one set of measurements rather than
another, the difficulty disappears. There is no need for a faster
than light signal to tell particle A what measurement has been
carried out on particle B, because the universe, including
particle A, already "knows" what that measurement, and its outcome,
will be.
--- end quoting John Bell ---
I am prepared to give a new definition of Superdeterminism here in
2008.
New definition of Superdeterminism: Time is a subset of
Superdeterminism,
since in Superdeterminism time itself is controlled. So that leaves us
only
with what is time? And thus, Time is the arrangement of all atoms with
respect
to one another. How many atoms and how they are arranged. If all atoms
consisted
of 10 atoms and they all remained in the same position with respect to
one another
then there is no time in the Cosmos. But if an additional atom, the
11th is added or if
at least one of the ten atoms changes position with respect to the
other nine atoms,
then there is time. So, Superdeterminism is a bigger concept than is
the concept of
Time itself, because Superdeterminism is equal to Time plus the Future-
Time. Superdeterminism
makes the future.
Now let me define Time itself. Time is this total number of atoms and
the arrangement of
those atoms.
Consider a Hydrogen Atom of its electron dot cloud and take a still
picture of it. Consider
a Helium Atom and its electron dot cloud and take a still picture of
it. Do the same for all the
elements up to plutonium. Now construct a booklet and riffle through
the pages and you
have a motion picture of electron dot clouds. You also have a booklet
that is Time itself.
Alright, now, let us go through two Darwin Evolution scenarios. The
Darwin evolving of the
cheetah's speed and the Darwin evolution of humanity. The cheetah cat
before it existed was
a cat that could not run that fast. Then a mutation or several
mutations occurred that conferred
speed to this pre-cheetah and by giving this pre-cheetah extra speed
it was able to
gain more food in hunt and be more healthier than all his slower speed
rivals. Being more fed
and more healthy, he was able to gain more females to mate and had
more offspring than his
slower rivals. More offspring who all carried his genes of faster
speed. Add in reproductive
isolation and you end up with a new species that is the present day
cheetah.
Now let me give a Darwin Evolution Scenario for humanity. About 10
million years ago in
the vicinity of Sardinia Italy or southern Italy was a tree dwelling
apelike creature where one
of them had a behavioural proclivity to go to the ground and pick up
rocks and stones and to
thrust them forward at a target. This proclivity happened many times
before, but in this
case, there was mutations of this "throwing ape" where he not only had
a behavioural proclivity
to throw at targets but that he had a mutation in his bone anatomy
that he could pick up the
rock with ease because of his opposable thumb to other fingers whereas
his rivals did not
have that opposable thumb ease mutation. This mutation coupled with
the behavioural proclivity
gained him more food, and conquered his male rivals by pommelling them
with rocks. So he
had more female mates and a large number of offspring who also
inherited the opposable thumb
mutation. Given reproductive isolation this band became a new genetic
species unable to
mate with the prior ape rootstock species.
Now, let me go through the same time sequence of the Cheetah and
Humanity as seen by
Superdeterminism.
We have a still picture of a Plutonium Atom, element number 94 and we
have a still picture
of a Americium Atom, element 95. Now we do not have precise pictures
but the Nucleus of the
231Pu Atom Totality has precise still pictures of a Plutonium Atom of
all of its atoms. And
this nucleus has a still picture of all the atoms and their
arrangements in a full sequence
as they go from 231Pu into the next element. Remember the want-to-be
singer? He has
not just two still pictures but has a large number of still pictures
to be able to make a
motion picture series.
Well, alright now, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality has let us say
10^160 number of still
pictures of all the atoms and their arrangements of the sequence that
goes from Element
94 to Element 95. A small number of those still pictures is the
sequence of atoms arranged
for a preCheetah to go to a Cheetah. Another sequence of still
pictures is the sequence of
a apelike creature in Southern Italy that emerges into a humanlike
creature some millions
of still picture frames later.
Alright, do you see what I am saying? Probably not.
What I am saying is that time itself and Darwin Evolution is carried
out by the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality, wherein this Cosmic Control Center they have still
picture frames of where they
have a full count of how many atoms exist and where their location is
from one another. One
of those still picture frames requires atoms to move across the
African plains with a faster speed
than previous frames and in that Control Center one of those still
frames requires an arrangement
of atoms to have atoms of a rock being hurdled somewhere in Sardina
Italy 10 million years ago.
So this Cosmic Control Center does not see Earth and life and cheetahs
and humans. What it
sees is that the still picture frame of the entire Cosmos has so and
such number of atoms
located around Earth and they have to be arranged differently in the
next sequence still frame.
And it is their job (whoever these Cosmic Controllers are), it is
their job to see that the frame
x goes into frame x+1 smoothly.
I see where I am going to have to be spending alot of Time in
explaining this.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Archimedes Plutonium - 19 Apr 2008 19:00 GMT
> On PBS TV is a one minute clip (PBS is not supposed to have commercial
> ads). Anyway, the
[quoted text clipped - 200 lines]
> I see where I am going to have to be spending alot of Time in
> explaining this.
Now I should comment on Time Travel, since the movies and TV and books
and other venues are full of this time travelling nonsense. Time Travel
is possible in the Big Bang and its exotica of black-holes. But
Time-Travel is impossible and utter nonsense in the Atom Totality theory.
As I outlined above of the definition of time as the total number of
atoms and the arrangement of those atoms with respect to one another. So
to be able to time-travel, means you have the power to arrange and
control every atom in the cosmos. So you have to be as powerful of
controlling the Cosmos as the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and you
cannot do such.
So Time Travelling is pure fictional nonsense. Much like waking up
tomorrow and hopscotching down to the gingerbread house where we are
met by a witch of the east west.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Archimedes Plutonium - 19 Apr 2008 19:12 GMT
Now there is a question as to what the distinction is between
EPR and EPRB where the B stands for the contributions of Bohm.
The question is whether the Bell Inequality is different for
EPR and that of EPRB.
I do not have the time at this moment to check into this question.
I believe what the answer is, though, is that the Bohm contribution
to the EPR of 1935, was that the Bohm contribution was to clarify
EPR. So that EPR of 1935 was not as clear as EPRB.
But as to the impact of EPRB upon the Bell Inequality and the concept
of Superdeterminism by John Bell of 1985, the impact was no impact.
That is to say that EPR is the same as EPRB with respect to the
concept of Superdeterminism. So the only difference between EPR
and EPRB is that the Bohm contribution makes EPR more clear.
If I am wrong and that EPRB is different from EPR and not just a
clarifier, well, then, I have to pursue this matter with urgency, but
I am suspecting that Bohm only made more clear, and that does not
deserve an urgency.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies