#60 a computation that tells us if alien advanced life exists; biophysics trilogy book series: "Darwin Evolution replaced by Superdeterminism from Quantum Mechanics"

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com - 20 Apr 2008 08:48 GMT

Assume the Atom Totality theory is true and the modus operandi is
Superdeterminism. Also,
assume the Nucleus of the Atom Totality is the control central. Now
make some other assumptions
such as life requires more energy than maintaining nonliving material.
And one can think of
the force of gravity, the weakest possible Coulomb force, is all that
is needed to maintain
most of the substance of the Cosmos. So gravity is much like the brain
stem in a individual
human where heart beat and breathing are run on auto-pilot by the
brain stem, so the force
of gravity in the Cosmos is like this auto pilot force whereas the
best and premium Coulomb
force and interactions take place on living matter.

I and others, in the 1990s computed how many Coulomb Interactions had
to take place
in a atom of plutonium to hold it all together. That came out to
roughly 10^190 per second,
if my memory is correct, and will have to recheck that. That is a huge
number and I have been
wondering for two decades now whether we have enough data and
information to be able
to compute whether humanity is the only advanced intelligent life in
the Cosmos or whether
we are not alone.

If today we do not have enough data and numbers, then it is only a
matter of time before
we do, and carry out the computation. I strongly feel we will compute
whether we are alone
long before we have physical evidence of the prescence of advanced
aliens.

In the 1990s I held two different lines of thought, for and against
advanced aliens. I said that
the elements are distributed uniformly throughout the Cosmos so that
would imply a uniform
distribution of advanced life in the Cosmos. Against other advanced
life I said that all it takes
is one advanced lifeform in the Cosmos for Superdeterminism to wield
its fate, where humanity
nucleosynthesizes the transplutonium elements all up to element 190 to
usher in the new
Atom Totality. So the argument "for" many advanced alien lifeforms is
the argument of the
uniform distribution of the elements in the Cosmos. The arguement
"against" advanced aliens
and where humanity is all alone says that it takes only one
intelligent life form and why waste
the large amount of energy to maintain all those alien lifeforms,
where the Cosmic Atom
Totality is thrifty and saving of energy.

So if we have enough data and information of the Cosmos, and assuming
the Atom Totality
as the true theory, can we calculate whether we are alone in the
Cosmos? I believe if we cannot
calculate now, we should be able to do it soon.

What I am suspicious of an answer, is that the answer may come out
where it satisfies
the uniform distribution but it also has a constraint of energy cost.
In such a situation,
the answer may come out to where there are say 6 or 12 advanced
lifeforms in the Cosmos,
where one inhabits one lobe of the 5f6. So I am leery that the answer
maybe where
intelligent life exists in only 6 or 12 locations coinciding with the
6 or 12 lobes of the 5f6.

Now maybe there is a way of spotting nuclear radiation of advanced
life so that we can
spot a bar or pellet of radioactive uranium or plutonium on a planet
that has advanced life.
Or perhaps the radioactive fuel cells of our interplanetary space
program can be spotted.

The day is not far away when we can sit down and do calculations and
figure out if we are
alone in the Cosmos or how many planets have advanced intelligent
life.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Reply to this Message

plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com - 20 Apr 2008 18:16 GMT

Now here is a post quite recently done by me, concerning how many
Coulomb Interactions exist
in the 231Pu Atom Totality in order to hold together the Universe and
make it work:

Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.math
From: "a_plutonium" <a_pluton...@hotmail.com>
Date: 24 Jan 2007 00:40:51 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 24 2007 3:40 am
Subject: *5* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory
in PHYSICS" ; Cosmic blackbody microwave radiation

a_plutonium wrote:

> Now I have listed these supporting evidences according to what I deem
> the greatest weight of support
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> 10) inverse fine structure constant and proton to electron mass ratio
> 11) pi e explained

Atom Totality theory explains uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic
microwave
background radiation

First question to those who know physics, can you
really have a
blackbody radiation such as the ones that Planck had
studied and
had researched and used to form the foundation of
quantum mechanics
that is not uniform? That it may have fluctuations?
Second question,
can the Cosmos really have a blackbody radiation and
not be a cavity?
Such as the cavity of the 5f6 of 231Pu?
Third question, can you really have a blackbody cavity
as the Cosmos itself and not be an Atom?

-------
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Newsgroups:
sci.physics,sci.physics.
particle,sci.chem,sci.physics.electromag,sci.astro
Subject: Re: Minimum Coulomb Interactions for
plutonium
Date: 30 Sep 1995 02:39:12 GMT
Lines: 92

In article (44e36n...@rzsun02.rrz.uni-hamburg.de>
fc3a...@AMRISC03.math.uni-hamburg.de (Hauke Reddmann)
writes:

> And Pu is then the case where even the Schroedinger
> equation can't be written out. (Remember that Pu has

a so high

> mass number that relativistic effects come in.) In

this case you

> use approximations, like treating closed shells as a

spherically

> symmetric potential. Of course the calculations then

are not

> nearly exact as in the H case.
> So, which value should YOU use? As you are sort of a
> neopythagorean, I fear you won't be satisfied with

approximations

> and must use the 95!/2 value. Even worse, this only

nails down

> the coulomb interactions. There are loads of

second-order effects

> due to spin dependent interactions.
> Hope this helps. This post got very long, but you

see what happens

> when you get into the realm of "dirty" science, with

all sorts of

> models, approximations and calculations.

Thank you very much both Hauke Reddmann and Gerald
L. Hurst.
The Coulombic states is a very large number indeed.
And it is
commonsense and intuition that says that a neon atom
is held in
place by lots more than just 190 things going on. Neon
is held up
by at least 10^7 things going on.

I can use any of these large numbers for plutonium,
(2^188 x2x2x2) of (n,L,M_L,m_s), or the 95!/2, or the
one which
I favor the most since as of recent it comes from the
Hydrogen
Atom Systems where all the forces are either Coulombic
or
Radioactivity. Thus 231PU is ((2^231) x2x2x2) or
232!/2.
With those large numbers it really does not matter
for the
difference of one more electron and proton in the next
element
after plutonium, which is element 95. These numbers
are so huge
and that is what is needed in order to compose a
thermodynamics.

> Archimedes Plutonium
> www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Reply to this Message

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / April 2008

#60 a computation that tells us if alien advanced life exists; biophysics trilogy book series: "Darwin Evolution replaced by Superdeterminism from Quantum Mechanics"