Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / August 2008

(snipped)

With mercury as the root cause of these 5 diseases, alot more things are
becoming clearer. For instance, a long time ago I was questioning the
sterilization of Mad Cow disease as to why such inferno temperatures of
burning these cattle down to the bones? Seems as though protein is
fragile to heat yet in Mad Cow sterilization they go way too far
overboard. Well, mercury as the cause of Mad Cow means the heat of
sterilization has to be to the point where any mercury atoms or
compounds in the cow's tissues is disarmed.

The spread of Mad Cow disease was not the intake of some alleged harmful
protein molecule, it was the mercury atoms within those protein
molecules that was the culprit.

And how easy it is to explain why England seems to have the highest
density of sheep scrapie. England burned alot of coal for thousands of
years and coal burning emits mercury into the air. Also, some mercury
was used in sheep maintenance. And thermometers in old times to check
sheep were mercury thermometers. So sheep in England were often exposed
to mercury and the feeding of mercury brain tissue to animals as a
protein supplement was another avenue of exposure.

The first cases ever of human prion disease was in New Guinea where I am
told has mercury mining.

But the history of these 5 diseases as far as I know, which is not a
comprehensive knowledge, is that with the exception of Schizophrenia
that the other 4 diseases were relatively all newcomers in history where
Alzheimer's first appears around 1901 and human prion disease appears
around 1950s and Autism about 1930s and Parkinsons about 1930s.

So how does the history and facts and data tell us that these 5 diseases
are *not Genetic caused*? The reasoning is simple. If they were genetic
caused diseases, then there would not have been a sudden appearance in
the 1900s and previously unknown, coupled with the fact that they would
not have an accelerated frequency during the 1900s. Autism rose from 1
in 100,000 children to 1 in 166. As one medical scientist said " show me
an autistic person who would have been 30 years old in 1960 when he made
the comment" So if Autism is genetic based, then there would have been
no accelerated rates.

When you have diseases in a century that seem to come out of nowhere and
when they accelerate in rates indicates the root cause is not genetics
but is a poison within the environment. Genetics can be a *contributing
factor* but not a root cause.

The fact that mostly boys contract Autism is because mercury loves
sulfur and the development of the brain between boys and girls exposed
to mercury is far more harmful to a boy's brain development than a girl's.

It is often said that "early onset Alzheimers" is genetic, but here
again is a lack of logic applied to the data and facts. Genetics can
contribute to the onset of Alzheimer's in that mercury exposure can be
detrimental to those whose body cannot clean out the mercury. So
genetics can contribute but genetics does not cause any of these 5 diseases.

And let me comment on the research journal coverage of these 5 diseases
for the past century. It is a horribly awful biased coverage wherein
anyone doing some genetics work was given ample space in the journals of
medicine and science. Trouble was, we needed researchers who focused on
what where and how much atoms of mercury and other metals exist in the
brain cells of victims of these 5 diseases. Here it is 2008 and still no
science journal nor medical journal has a research report detailing how
much atoms of mercury exist in these victims brain cells. We have
thousands and millions of reports of genetics of these 5 diseases but
not one single in depth report of atoms of mercury in brain cells of
these 5 diseases. Science journals for the past 100 years should be
ashamed of themselves for their dismal record.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies