Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Seeking clarification in understanding genetic concepts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sky Fly - 15 Apr 2004 20:26 GMT
Hello all,

I'm trying to understand about genetic engineering by reading the
relevant articles on www.wikipedia.org, but I'm having some difficulty.

First of all, there's the article on genomes, where it says:

"In biology, the genome of an organism is a complete DNA sequence of
one set of chromosomes..."

For me, this means that each genome will be different for each
person. But I know that recently, there has been a project going on
to describe the "human genome". I assume that this cannot then refer to
a single person, but then how possible is it to arrive at a 'generic
genome' for all of humanity?

Also, I've been trying to understand meiosis. Am I correct in saying
that this only happens when sperm or egg cells are being made?
At what time in a human beings life would this be - is this a
continuous process, or a one off? I ask, because I seem to recall
reading that a woman has all the eggs that she will ever produce
when she is born.

Also, am I right in saying that each of these reproductive cells
has a different combination of genetic material from the person
that produces it, depending on which of the 23 chromosomes is
selected from either his mother's chromosome set or his father's
chromosome set and on the effects of 'crossing over' during meiosis?
How much 'crossing over' actually takes place - does it occur at
multiple points in each chromosome?

Thanks in advance for any answers or confirmations.

--
Akin

aknak at aksoto dot idps dot co dot uk
r norman - 15 Apr 2004 20:58 GMT
>Hello all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>Thanks in advance for any answers or confirmations.

"The" human genome is a misnomer, as you say, because everybody does
have slight differences.  However, the overall structure of the genome
is the same for everybody.  The idea is to understand just what genes
are present at what locations and what all the other stuff is that
does not seem to be involved in coding. The exact form of each gene is
less important.

You are also right about meiosis.  In animals, it is only involved in
the production of eggs and sperm.  For humans, girls seem to be born
with all the eggs they will ever make arrested early in meiosis.  In
fact, the second cell division isn't really complete until after the
sperm has fertilized the egg! Males work a bit differently.  In males,
meiosis begins at puberty and then continues at a fairly high rate,
gradually diminishing with age. Other animals work differently.  And
other organisms like fungi and work even more differently.

You are also right about genetic variability in the sperm and eggs.
Each one has a different set of alleles, depending on which of the
paired chromosomes happens to be selected.  Crossover is very
frequent.  Ordinarily there are one or more crossover events that
happen on every chromosome.  Of course, the bigger chromosomes end up
with more crossovers than the smaller ones.  The total length of the
human genome is about 3000 centimorgans, where 1 centimorgan
represents a 1% chance of crossover.  Therefore you can expect an
average of about 30 crossovers to occur in each meiotic division.
Since there are 23 chromosomes, this averages to just over one per
chromosome.  Crossover can happen all along the chromosome, but there
seem to be "hot spots" where crossover is more likely.
Sky Fly - 15 Apr 2004 22:04 GMT
Hello R Norman,

Thank you very much for your answers to my question.

> "The" human genome is a misnomer, as you say, because everybody does
> have slight differences.  However, the overall structure of the genome
> is the same for everybody.  The idea is to understand just what genes
> are present at what locations and what all the other stuff is that
> does not seem to be involved in coding. The exact form of each gene is
> less important.

I still need to clarify something here, though. You say:

"The idea is to understand just what genes are present at what
locations."

My understanding of genes is that they represent an encoding for
proteins. I assume that these proteins will be used to make different
parts of the body. But since each person's body is different,
surely that means that there will be different proteins? For
example, the proteins needed to make a blue iris will be
different from that used to make a brown iris. Or am I misunderstanding
something here? Could it be that the genes are the *same*
in all cases, but they differ in *form*, as you said? If so,
how would this difference show up - what possible variations
in the form of genes are there?

While on the topic of genes in the DNA of a cell, if each cell
has exactly the same copy of DNA, does this mean that not *all*
the genes in the DNA are used by the cell in making its protein?
It seems to me then that it would be more efficient for each cell
just to have the genes it needs, but then again, I guess that's
how the dice have been thrown in the evolution of the species.

Thanks once more,

--
Akin

aknak at aksoto dot idps dot co dot uk
r norman - 16 Apr 2004 04:32 GMT
>Hello R Norman,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
>Thanks once more,

I was trying to avoid using the word "alleles", not knowing just how
elementary or advanced your study is so far.   The idea is that each
gene is a specific location (gene locus) on a chromosome that codes
for a particular protein.  (That is a drastically out-of-date and
oversimplified notion of a gene, but that is a different story).
However the genes can differ in form, giving different alleles for
each gene.  So we all have genes for eye color, but some have the
alleles that produce a lot of pigment and have dark eyes while some
have alleles that produce much less pigment and have light colored
eyes.  The difference, of course, is in the details of the genetic
code and therefore in the sequence of amino acid in the protein.
Still, the overall structure of the gene is so similar and the number
of agreements in the genetic code so overwhelmingly larger than the
number of changes, that the code for one individual is a good start to
understanding things.  For eye color, the protein is one that is
involved in producing the dark pigment.  If you have a mutation in
that gene, the defective protein can synthesize the pigment so your
eyes don't have any -- they look blue.  (Again, an oversimplification,
but it illustrates the point).

As someone else has pointed out, the variations between humans are
really quite trivial compared with the enormous similarities.  For
example, I am now looking at the set of wood chairs around my dining
room table. They look identical.  However a close inspection shows
that the pattern of wood grain differs from chair to chair.  Each
chair is, in a sense, unique.  So which is it?  Are the chairs really
the same or are they really different?  Think of the variations
between individuals like the variation in the grain.  The initial goal
of the genome project is to get an idea of what shape and size the
chairs are, to see how the structure of the seat and the back and the
arms and the legs serves the function of being a chair.  Meanwhile,
people are starting to look at the fine details, the grain structure.
The details are of great medical importance, just as the grain pattern
might influence the strength of that section of wood.

The terminology is confusing.  Everyone has the same "eye color
genes".  However, different people have different alleles for eye
color, different forms of those genes.

Your second question is about every cell having all the genes to make
every kind of cell.  You are again correct:  in each cell only a
fraction of the genes are expressed.  Each cell type expresses a
different set of genes.  The mechanism to switch genes on and off is
really the key to understanding how the genome functions. One way of
turning genes on and off is by binding proteins to them.  Another way
is to modify them chemically (methylation). It is one thing just to
make a list of all the proteins that a cell can possibly make.  It is
a very different thing to make a list of which proteins any specific
cell makes at any particular point in the life of the organism.  That
is the move from genomics to proteonics.  We are really just beginning
to understand that story. The next ten to twenty years should be very
exciting on that perspective!

It really would be a mess to try to isolate just which genes any cell
would need.  Besides, many genes are not needed all the time but might
be very important sometime later for that cell.  So it is simply a lot
simpler and easier for every cell to have all the genes, but just shut
off the unused ones.
edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges - 15 Apr 2004 21:08 GMT
> For me, this means that each genome will be different for each
> person. But I know that recently, there has been a project going on

yes
excepting things like twins and clones
everythings genome is probably unique

however the variations are usually very very small

also for each species each gene is usually one of small and limited set
so that after examining a handful of samples
you should be able to get all the genes and variations of the genes

we now have the genome of about ten people
and much of the current research is in identifyinh and cataloging variant genes
that result in disease and disability in additional populations

> Also, I've been trying to understand meiosis. Am I correct in saying
> that this only happens when sperm or egg cells are being made?
> At what time in a human beings life would this be - is this a
> continuous process, or a one off? I ask, because I seem to recall
> reading that a woman has all the eggs that she will ever produce
> when she is born.

meiois occurs shortly before the sperm or egg are produced
from nursery cells in the testes or ovaries

it has been long thought that women were born
with all their cells that generate egg
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.