Hemoglobin transports oxygen.
Our hemoglobin is similar to that of gorillas, chimpanzees, and
monkeys. Not the same, but similar.
Our hemoglobin is less similar to that of cows, horses, pigs,
chickens, horses, whales, and rabbits.
Our hemoglobin is even less similar to that of turtles, snakes, and
lizards.
There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and monkeys.
There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
humans, cows, horses, pigs, chickens, horses, whales, and rabbits.
There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
humans, turtles, snakes, and lizards.
Moontanman - 29 Apr 2004 07:04 GMT
>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and monkeys.
>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>humans, cows, horses, pigs, chickens, horses, whales, and rabbits.
>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>humans, turtles, snakes, and lizards.
Actually there is reason, whales are a good example. they need super effecient
hemoglobin so they can hold their breath for a long time. Other animals have
other needs, chimps actually have some of the same blood types as humans and
could be used as blood doners but that would open us up to cross infection with
viruses that chimps are immune to and we aren't, like aids.
Moon
r norman - 29 Apr 2004 12:31 GMT
>>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>>humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and monkeys.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Moon
David ford's post about hemoglobin doesn't seem to have any point. It
is a mystery why he would announce such old and well-known facts. Is
he simply trying to illustrate neutral variation -- genetic drift?
Whale hemoglobin is not a super oxygen binder -- it still holds one
molecule of oxygen per heme group, just like all the others. The
slight differences in amino acid sequence do make some differences in
how oxygen binds, in the affinity and in the sensitivity of hemoglobin
to other factors like pH or DPG or other regulators. Still, probably
much of the variation is neutral.
Blood types and immune responses to transfusions are based on many
factors, but hemoglobin is not one of them.
Moontanman - 29 Apr 2004 16:21 GMT
>Whale hemoglobin is not a super oxygen binder -- it still holds one
>molecule of oxygen per heme group, just like all the others.
I have seen it quoted in many forms of literature that hemoglobin in whales is
much more effecient than in humans. I don't know in what way but i would have
to do some reserch before i would dismiss an idea with so much backing. You may
be right but like I said i've seen it written many times and quoted in
lecutures on the subject.
Moon
Gautam Majumdar - 29 Apr 2004 18:36 GMT
>>Whale hemoglobin is not a super oxygen binder -- it still holds one
>>molecule of oxygen per heme group, just like all the others.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> so much backing. You may be right but like I said i've seen it written
> many times and quoted in lecutures on the subject.
Whales can release more oxygen from their haemoglobin. Venous blood in
humans, after releasing oxygen, is normally about 40% saturated, i.e.,
only 60% oxygen is released. In extreme hypoxia this can go up to about
65%. Whales can release 90% oxygen from their haemoglobin. It is not only
haemoglobin, or more accurately the three dimentional structure of the
globin chains that matters. As Norman has pointed out several other control
mechanisms are involved in this better oxygen release phenomenon.

Signature
Gautam Majumdar
Please send e-mails to gmajumdar@freeuk.com
r norman - 29 Apr 2004 22:35 GMT
>>>Whale hemoglobin is not a super oxygen binder -- it still holds one
>>>molecule of oxygen per heme group, just like all the others.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>globin chains that matters. As Norman has pointed out several other control
>mechanisms are involved in this better oxygen release phenomenon.
I believe a major factor is in the quantity of myoglobin whales have
in their tissues. Myoglobin is an efficient oxygen binding agent with
much higher affinity than hemoglobin and is capable of removing oxygen
from the blood for storage in the tissue.
Still, the question remains unanswered: what in the world did David
Ford have in mind by posting all that stuff?
bae@cs.toronto.edu.no-uce.yyz - 29 Apr 2004 16:02 GMT
>Hemoglobin transports oxygen.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Our hemoglobin is even less similar to that of turtles, snakes, and
>lizards.
Yes. The degree of difference is correlated with phylogenetic distance,
i.e. the more closely related two groups are, the more similar their
hemoglobin is likely to be.
Do you have some other point?
>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and monkeys.
You are aware that there are people with mutant forms of hemoglobin, right?
Sometimes it's bad for them not to be more standard. And there's also
fetal hemoglobin in mammals, convenient for those times before you start
breathing.
>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>humans, cows, horses, pigs, chickens, horses, whales, and rabbits.
Dunno about that. Chickens can fly, after all, and whales can deep dive,
remaining submerged for hours.
>There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
>humans, turtles, snakes, and lizards.
Dunno about that either. Turtles can hibernate submerged in the mud at the
bottom of both fresh and salt waters for months on end. Reptiles in general
have a much lower oxygen requirement and higher CO2 tolerance than mammals
and birds because they don't maintain their body temperatures by producing
heat by oxidizing foods. So their hemoglobin doesn't need to be as good as
that of birds and mammals.
Of course, there's a lot more to regulating oxygen levels than the
characteristics of hemoglobin, and I don't know how important hemoglobin is
vs other factors in giving different taxa their ability to manage their
oxygen levels when they do remarkable things like fly or stop breathing for
hours or months. So whatever your point is, "no physiological reason" for
differences is incorrect.
Philipp Pagel - 29 Apr 2004 16:50 GMT
> Our hemoglobin is similar to that of gorillas, chimpanzees, and
> monkeys. Not the same, but similar.
[...]
> There is no physiological reason for hemoglobin to be different in
> humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and monkeys.
[...]
People have already responded to this - so I won't go into it again. I
just want to add that being different essentially means the sequence has
changed over the course of evolution. This may or may not lead to
*functional* differences.
But my main question ist this: What point are you trying to make? Are
you wondering why they have diverged? Do you think this fact
supports/contradicts some theory (which?)? I think the discussion would
get a lot more meaningfull if we knew your question/point/whatever.
cu
Philipp

Signature
Dr. Philipp Pagel Tel. +49-89-3187-3675
Institute for Bioinformatics / MIPS Fax. +49-89-3187-3585
GSF - German National Research Center for Environment and Health
Email: p.pagel AT gsf . de
http://mips.gsf.de/~pagel