Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / March 2005

I please need help on a term to describe a concept. The idea that human
population is the greatest single factor shaping history. The idea that
wars are primarily caused from overpopulation, albeit there are other
factors but the single largest factor is group A has too many humans and
will thence wage war on group B.

Listening to the state of the union speech tonight with its lofty and
idealistic theme of freedom and democracy. I need a science biology term
for that of bringing babies into a world when the environment and niche
in social life warrant it. A term that makes couples and females not
greedy to pollute the world with more people than they can raise in a
decent life. Whenever we see a family in Africa we see women with 7 to
10 kids and no food and no future. When we see a family in Mexico about
to illegally immigrate into the USA we see them with 6 to 9 kids. When
we see poor people in India or China we see them with 5 to 7 kids.

I need a term of biology, that parents can see their environment, their
niche and their society and to take responsibility to not have any kids
if they cannot give them a minimal standard of living.

The Palestinians are at war with the Israelis, and thus the Palestinians
have one of the highest birth rates in the world. People at war produce
kids. Mexico is at war with the USA for it overpollutes their land with
more kids than they can care for and thus they illegally invade the USA.

Earth can sustain about 3 billion humans on renewable energy. And if
Earth had only 3 billion humans now, there would be virtually no wars
and all would be at peace. And there would not be a global warming
threat. And the animals on the endangered or extinction list would
stabilize and rebound.

So, as Mr. Bush gives the state of the union speech, he is mostly
talking about further greed and further erosion and destruction of this
planet. When he says that freedom and democracy should be on the rise
throughout the world, does he mean that women have the freedom to have
as many kids as they feel like it? Does he mean by freedom that human
population should rise to 8 billion then 9 then 10 then 11 then 12
billion?

When this planet reaches more billions of people from its already 7
billion then terrorism increases, then a nuclear war increases, then the
extinction of all animals larger than the size of a dog in the wild is
assured, then global warming intensifies and vast ecosystems are
destroyed, then diseases and plagues increase.

As human overpopulation increases then living standards decrease rapidly
and not just for the middle and lower classes but every class.

Since freedom contradicts planned parenthood where laws are enacted that
you need permission and license to have a child born and where women are
limited in how many babies they can have. So the message of a State of
the Union that is more in tune with this 21st century is one not of
freedom and democracy but one of calling upon the world to freeze human
populations and to have laws limiting the number of children born.

Instead of a International Court for war crimes and inhumanity there
should be a Court that freezed human populations and limits the number
of births.

The past 2 centuries of the USA history have not been much about freedom
but mostly a long list of Greed. Simply look at the Budget Deficit.
Simply look at Social Security where people on SS nowadays make more
money then when they were actually working. I know of many people who
make more money from SS then when they were in the workplace.

Some French philosopher said that Democracy works only until the people
find how to vote money into their pockets and that day of reckoning will
come to the USA in the 21st century. So Democracy fails in the economics
arena but it also fails in the "clear thinking arena" as was noticed in
the 2004 election that religion can win the highest office of
government. So the French philosopher may have missed a important
destructive factor of a democracy in that religion takes over and
destroys the system via its bigotry and inflexibility to let science
decide major political issues.

So in the STate of the Union of February 2005, if I or a scientist
president had given the speech would call for a new term of politics
something of a biological ring such as Environmental Niche. Please help
me out for this term. It would call for a revamp of Social Security for
it is too generous. It would call for a law set in place that a woman is
limited to the number of babies. It would call for a physical barrier
such as what Israel is putting up, only here the USA put up around the
Mexican border. Unless the USA does some drastic about Mexico, then the
USA will be spanish speaking in the next century and all white property
expropriated much the same as in Zimbabwe. The case with Mexico is much
more serious than just guest workers and jobs that Yanks will not do.
Unless the USA realizes the gravity of the problem, then Mexico will
outnumber Yanks and take over the USA.

Instead of freedom and democracy as goals of the 21st century, we need a
newer and higher and better goal. We need to realize in this century
that planet EArth is small and that our human overpopulation is ruining
it. That we need to control population to control pollution and global
warming. What good is it for poor starving disease ridden jobless people
to go to a poll to vote? And as long as populations increase, terrorism
increases. If we control population then everyone borne is a wanted
child and family will be concerned that they do not turn to violence and
antisocial.

So in the 21st century, our new goal is "planned parenthood". Clean
environment and jobs for everyone borne. A Earth that has room for all
wild animals and not another 4 billion more humans on top of the already
7 billion. A planet of people that can sustain itself on renewable
energy.

So instead of grasping of the 19th and 20th century platitude of Freedom
and Democracy, we live in a new world of the 21st century where our goal
is to make living and life on Earth for every human that of a clean
environment, peace, and job and prosperity. Of which none can be
realized unless human population is controlled and limited.

So what the world needs foremost is legal laws freezing human
populations and limiting the number of children per woman.

Human overpopulation is the number one biggest evil and unless it is
controlled all other evils will be a consequence of overpopulation.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies