Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Biology / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

new prize for best contribution to science in the past year

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ere - 27 Jul 2006 06:01 GMT
hi,

i'm organising an award ceremony for the best contribution to science
in the past year. i have not yet decided on the size of the prize money

but it is likely to be in the thousands rather than millions of
dollars. i hope to award this prize on a yearly basis and shall be
considering nominations over the next year. this award differs from
others in that it is for the best contribution to science over a one
year period and so is recent and relevant and will attract a wider
catchment of candidates. candidates are expected to give a lecture
explaining their contribution to science. this award will, hopefully,
attract global publicity. please present your nominations here or by
email. also please suggest a suitable name for this prize, such as the
science prize.
John Jones - 27 Jul 2006 19:30 GMT
> hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> email. also please suggest a suitable name for this prize, such as the
> science prize.

dO YoU Find ExceSSIVe Use of CApiTol LetTeRSs AnnOYING ?
i do
zzbunker@netscape.net - 08 Aug 2006 02:46 GMT
> > hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> dO YoU Find ExceSSIVe Use of CApiTol LetTeRSs AnnOYING ?
> i do

 That's why the prize has to named selectic 5.2.4

 Since it's a waste of money to the prize to a physicist,
 since they have a bias against any punctuation that is not graffitti.

  It's a waste a time to give the prize to a biologist, since
  they have a bias all things that are not Australian.

  And it's a waste of space to give the prize to a Chemist, since
  they have a bias against everything that is not
  ph balanced to 4.5/
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.