> Now what happens if given a specific cube or square where
> the staggered packing in hex or hexagonal-close-packing
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
> in humanmade conditions but rather shows up in chemistry and
> physics also.
Now I wonder if in biology for the need of maximum storage space that
the Corner-Edge-HCP shows up, where you have a HCP stacking.
The DNA and RNA of living creatures needs maximum density for
storage space. So I wonder if Corner-Edge-HCP shows up in
viruses that are so small yet require the internals to do a wide
range of operations. So density would have a key role.
Is not the DNA double helix a hexagonal close packing of the
genome? And if so is there a corner which seems to have
the largest density?
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Alright, I looked to see what the current status of density is on
osmium versus
iridium.
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmium
Osmium is an extremely dense, blue-gray, hard but brittle metal that
remains lustrous even at high temperatures. Due to its hardness,
brittleness, and very high melting point (the tenth highest of all
elements), solid osmium is difficult to machine, form, or work. Osmium
is generally considered to be the densest known element, narrowly
defeating iridium.[2] Calculations of density from the space lattice
may produce the most reliable data for these elements, giving a
density of 22.562±0.009 g/cm3 for iridium versus 22.587±0.009 g/cm3
for osmium.[3] The extraordinary density of osmium is a consequence of
the lanthanide contraction.[3]
--- end quoting ---
The crystal structure of Osmium is listed as "hexagonal" and the
crystal structure of Iridium is listed as "face centered cubic".
Now that means both are really hexagonal because FCC is just
a look at HCP from a different angle. Both have density of 74%.
What is different is that chemistry and physics experiments turn up
with a measurement that slightly favors osmium in density over
iridium.
So, with the new-found discovery of Corner-Edge-Hexagonal packing
versus the Hexagonal-alone packing that the former has a slightly more
dense packing.
So I wonder, if the reason that osmium is this slightly more dense
element
than is iridium is for the specific reason as this illustration shows:
Corner-Edge-Hexagonal:
XOOOOOO
OOOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOOO
Hexagonal-alone:
OOOOOO
OOOOOOO
OOOOOO
OOOOOOO
You see, at the end of stacking, if the elevation of the layers is
such that there
is a tiny bit more room and thus lift up the entire last layer
(sometimes
the secondmost last layer) and scoot them
over rightwardmost leaving a entire row empty on the leftmost side of
the crystal
and thus increasing the density by an entire row of atoms.
So, is Osmium a Corner-Edge-Hexagonal Packed crystal containing an
entire
row more of osmium atoms whereas Iridium is a Hexagonal-alone crystal
that
is barren of that extra row in a corner-edge??
This maybe easy to check, and validate if true, in that Corner-Edge-
Hexagonal
density would have a pecular "localized density at one of its corner
edges."
This favored corner edge is where the extra row of atoms would lie.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Archimedes Plutonium - 04 Jul 2009 06:26 GMT
> Alright, I looked to see what the current status of density is on
> osmium versus
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> edges."
> This favored corner edge is where the extra row of atoms would lie.
If memory is correct we can do X-ray diffraction patterns and where
the dots show where an atom is located. Can these diffraction patterns
discern whether osmium has one extra row per volume than does
iridium?
I want to find an example of Corner-edge-Hexagonal compared to
Hexagonal-alone.
Has anyone noticed something strange in the diffraction pattern of
osmium?
And perhaps in cold-physics of of near absolute zero, has anyone
noticed
something strange about the crystal lattice that seems to show one
more
row than expected to show?
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Y.Porat - 04 Jul 2009 08:34 GMT
On Jul 4, 7:26 am, Archimedes Plutonium
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Alright, I looked to see what the current status of density is on
> > osmium versus
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
------------------
see table No 2 in my abstract:!!!
look for In idnium
http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract
you should know that there are many kinds of molecules (lattice
units )
there is the most abundant one hexagonal
with 6 atoms in a unit
buit there are more denseones
like the irin with 2 additionals
acording to mytable it is with 6 Atoms
but each 'building stone' is of one atom
instead of 2 in the iron
etc etc
it is a whole world for itself to learn about it
but the botom line should be surprizing!!
all Atoms are more or less
or practically the same volume !!
soitis far more going conclusions
THERE ARE NO MANY 'SHLEELS' THAT ARE CLOSER OR MORE DISTANT FROM THE
NUC !!!
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------------