Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Earthquakes / July 2008

Dear Group,

I believe I have discovered the cause for the geomagnetic reversals (aka
polar reversal) and why the ice age occurs immediately after the polar
reversal. I know some of you will say that a complete reversal only happens
every 700,000 years but that is an old assumption. Geologists now know that
there is ample proof of short-term reversals that correlate to about 12,000
year cycles. I have discovered the exact number of years between these
reversals (12,068 years). The byproduct of my research explains why the
planet is experiencing global warming over the past 110 years. In summary,
we have global warming because our Sun's output has been increasing since
the 1890s. It varies with the sunspot cycle. The problem is that each
successive sunspot cycle and Gleissberg cycle (8 sunspots, last one being
January 1958) has been getting greater and greater. The reason for this is
we are approaching another geomagnetic reversal, with a high probability it
will happen between September and December 2046 during the next Gleissberg
cycle (136 Gleissberg cycles = 12,068 years). At the time of the reversal
our Sun novas and evaporates a great amount of ocean water that eventually
falls back on the earth as snow, thousands of feet of snow.

The logical scientific response to that statement is: there is no physical
connection, in this dimension, between what happens in the center of the Sun
and the center of the Earth. And you would be correct-using the matter
oriented theory of existence currently being taught. I would like to remind
all of you that what we call "science," has not explained what is light,
magnetism, gravity, and what cause the magnetic field of the Earth. It also
does not explain why we have over 350 sub-atomic "particles?" Why does Mars
display proof of past oceans and rivers and where did all the water go? What
causes the multiple ice age periods? And how did intelligent live evolve
from a few cells to mankind? There are many more phenomena "science" does
not have a clue about, but I'm sure you know plenty of them yourself. At
some point we must ask ourselves "is our foundation philosophy correct?" For
all the millions of man-hours scientists have spent trying to come up with a
"unified field theory" and still no success, you would think at some point
it would dawn on someone that something is very wrong!  It is-The reason I
have figured out why our sun novas at the same time as geomagnetic
reversals, is because I developed an information theory of existence, back
in 1978, and that enabled me to explain most of the phenomena others had not
been able to, using one unifying theory of existence-The Theory of
Multidimensional Reality. That was the key.

Even Stephen Hawkins, a few years ago, corrected his original idea
concerning what happens to the Universe after it collapses down to the size
of a grapefruit. He corrected his theory to state the Universe then goes to
information. He also corrected his previous theory about black holes, which
stated that when matter entered a black hole it was destroyed. His new
theory states that the matter is not destroyed but goes to information.
These two ideas were stated in my Chapter 6, p170, of Reality Revealed; The
Theory of Multidimensional Reality published 1978. This theory also unites
quantum field theory with closed-end string theory (see chapter 4 of my new
book).

Back to my previous statement about the Sun and the ice age. I have
discovered 6 blank periods in space where no stars are visible. Four of the
six are 12,068 years apart. I have correlated 6 geomagnetic reversals and 6
ice age advances with the same 12,000+/- clock cycle (c^14 dating). In fact
my model can explain all of the phenomena associated with the polar reversal
and ice age including the creation of new species.

Cold does not give you an ice age. The cold comes later. The following is
what happens. Here in Seattle, we had an ice field no less than 4,000-feet
thick and that is the lowest estimate I found. In order to have an ice field
4,000-feet thick you must have snow and lots of it. The next question to ask
yourself is: Where did the snow come from? It comes from clouds. How do you
get clouds? Clouds form from condensed water vapor. How do you get water
vapor? Heat from the Sun applied to the surface of the oceans form water
vapor in the atmosphere. I actually calculated how much snow that would be
and it comes to over 19,000-feet. At this point no matter how dumb this
society gets, you know this is not a normal snowfall. We know from
sedimentary evidence from numerous lakes around the world that the ice
fields were deposited within 40 years. So it's a simple equation. If we had
an ice field 4,000-feet thick then on the other side of the equation we must
have had an equal amount of calories of heat to evaporate the ocean water to
give us the snow to create the ice field. This logic is irrefutable and is
just chemistry 101. So why didn't academia figure it out? There are many
reasons, wrong models, egos, poor research, but the main reason is a
philosophical one. The Universe is the product of information and there is a
clock cycle that runs through time.

I believe the evidence I have accumulated is irrefutable. NASA knows our Sun
novas but they do not know why or when the next polar reversal will occur-I
do. The culmination of this research is in my new book "God's Day of
Judgment; The Real Cause of Global Warming" (2007). I have excerpts of all
the chapters on the publisher's web page (vectorpub.com). Chapter 3 explains
the information theory of existence that enabled me to explain the polar
reversal. Chapter 8 covers the proof that our Sun novas during the
geomagnetic reversal and what happen before, during and after the event.

http://www.vectorpub.com/Gods_Day_of_judgment.html

If you were born after 1980 you will not receive a dime of your social
security benefits because the USA will not exist after the next geomagnetic
reversal in 2046, so you should be very interested in what I have
discovered.

Douglas Vogt

Diehold Foundation