Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Earthquakes / July 2008

Surely someone will mention the "Hollow Earth".

Jack

18th to 25th July: 07:59. This spell is an 8 o'clock one.
For the duration of the spell.

And the last spell was based on the phase of the moon being somewhere
near 4 o'clock.

Fot its duration. 3rd rock from the sun, as usual. (The one right next
to the moon that is.)

I get the idea that these spells are similar except that with the
first, the weather was warm and a Low presented itself at the North
Pole.

That's the astronomical one which appears on the relevant weather
charts. Same 90 degree north location as was.

Tropical storms occurred on the North American coasts of the Pacific
and Atlantic.

As predicted.

With the coming spell, I imagine the predominant weather mass over the
North Pole will be an High,  such tropical storms as will occur during
the run, will tend to occur in the Indian and West Pacific oceans. As
opposed to the ones that occurred with the previous spell, which were
located near North America.

And we will have much the same weather in Britain as with the
preceding phase with the exception that it will be a lot colder.

Which is a matter of degree depending on the previous experience. Your
mileage will vary from mine.

And you really need the practice, so get cracking.

I don't see any mention of the 7.0 Honshu earthquake. How could you
miss that if your theories work?

Basically, W; this just doesn't work, does it? Much of it is based on
hindsight and it is written, deliberately, I feel in gobbledygook.
Your theory is not able to predict anything important for people. I
think it is a hobby for yourself, with no practical application
whatsoever. Sorry to disappoint you, but that's the conclusion I've
reached from monitoring what you do. It's just bad science.

Change my mind by accurately predicting something which can't be
predicted by other means. I'm pretty sure that you can't do that and
if you can't - your hobby is simply useless to anyone else.

But there is here: >
7.0 M. 2008/07/19 02:39. 37.6N. 142.1E. Off the east coast of Honshu,
Japan.

We have another example of the criticality of fluids once more. Two
consecutive 5.5s (or thereabouts) in much the same place, followed by
the stepping down in the power of a cyclone and then something on the
other side of that Fluid Mac Number: 666, a 7.

Either that or the dafties are right about plate tectonics. Bloody
morons. They will cling to any alternative to the truth until it is
too painful to just watch them. Anything other than see the
startlingly obvious.

On July 23, 6:22 pm, shitforbrains@hotmail.com> wrote:

I already have in another thread, you oaf.

Now   off while I talk to those that have more than your full
complement of brayne sells and that want to know where their future
lies. That is, anyone who wants to learn.

You prefer ignorance and being nice to you isn't worth the effort.
Go away.

Bernoulli showed how fluid flow varies according to its constraints:

http://home.earthlink.net/~mmc1919/venturi.html

He knew too that as the speeds and other contrivances changed, the
ratios changed with it and that the system breaks down at an unknown
variable rate of knots. But that it would break down at some point.

Dirac gave an axiom on the way waves behave as:
Observed quantity 1 x wave 1 + observed quantity 2 x wave 2 + ...
observed quantity n x wave n + etc.

When this breaks down you get an instability that either shows up as
disastrous behaviour -metal fatigue, or some such dynamic.

Or the cause and effect is rerouted, as in this spell's case, the
planet's fluid dynamic.

(I believe Dirac was postulating atomic behaviour. I don't remember.
Look it up if you are not kidding yourself you are interested. I had
to.)

It isn't the observed wave that is the cause, therefore the observed
wave is not determinative.

The <u>cause</u> of the waves in the first place is the "element" that
chooses where to dispose of any excess forces in the continuum.

Once you get to that "magic breakdown" situation, all normality ceases
and things like weather forecasts have to be massaged by the
meteorologists' superior knowledge.

I'd call it weather lore but forecast issuers baulk at that term,
preferring a denial of facts along with the skipping of data.

What you have is called criticality in nuclear physics. Short
circuiting in lesser (electronic) sciences.

Call it what the screaming hell you like in geo-science. I have
already given the reason, the answer and the forecasts necessary for
dealing with it all.

Dealing with only one fluid in a field that holds two and more, is a
recipe for disaster.

And that is what we are enjoying at present.

Or not, as the case may be.

["It isn't the observed wave that is the cause, therefore the observed
wave is not determinative.

The cause of the waves in the first place is the "element" that
chooses where to dispose of any excess forces in the continuum."

We know how far the atmosphere can be pushed in a demonstration of
this breaking down of the system. Wind follows strict guidelines all
over the globe and for all we know on all the planets, the sun
included.

It obeys the regime described in Beaufort's scale and follows much the
same trend right up to Force 5 tornadoes and Category 5 hurricanes.
After that the other natural disasters intrude on the metre.

It is the same with earthquakes. we have a host of 5.5's and then
almost on the same sliding scale Mag 6's then when we get into the 7's
and more, other things go astray in the planetary system.

How many threads contemplating unusual behaviour have we seen in this -
these, groups where this sort of display is present?

All of them call up such responses, I think. This is a given in
UK.sci.weather. Anyone who hasn't noticed is as big a fool as Dawlish.]