> This would also imply that you
> don't need to worry about the solubility of Pb(H2PO3)2 when trying
> phosphoric acid as the electrolyte, since Pb2 (PO3)2 will precipitate
> anyway.
Make that PO4 instead of PO3. Three minus charges, four oxygens.
Ed Ferris's previous post was like this :
>So if you take an aqueous solution of one mole of FeSO4
>and add one mole of H2SO4 to it,
>you have one mole of Fe++
>and two moles of HSO4- in solution,
Better said summary amount
of H2SO4, HSO4- AND SO4(-2) is 2 mols.
>Similarly, the lead-acid cathode reaction
>could form Pb(HSO4)2 as an intermediate
>but would precipitate PbSO4 and re-form H2SO4 from it.
In fact Pb2+ precipitates with existing SO4(2-),
that is corrupting acidobasic equilibrium,
and HSO4- dissociates to H+ and SO4(2-)
to keep c(H) . c(SO4) / c(HSO4) = K2
( dissociation constant of HSO4- )
Well, activity to be more precise.
Unless you have Pb(HSO4)2 in hand,
you can forget considering it as compound or salt,
but think about it as ion coexistence in solution.
If you dissolve 2 mols of NaCl and 1 mol of K2SO4,
or 2 mols of KCl and 1 mol of Na2SO4,
these salts does not exist in solution,
neither react each other.
Each kation belongs
to each anion in the same degree.
There are just K+, Na+, Cl- and SO4(2-) ions.
>This would explain why you don't get
>a stepwise reduction in potential
>as the acid is consumed
>and the electrolyte density approaches 1.
There is always excessive amount of H2SO4,
There is roughly 20-40% H2SO4, depending on
charge degree.
>This would also imply that you don't need
>to worry about the solubility of Pb(H2PO4)2
>when trying phosphoric acid as the electrolyte,
>since Pb3(PO4)2 will precipitate anyway.
Sure, but anyway, nothing from sulphuric system
can be applied to phosphoric system
without proper analysis. It is totally different system,
not just one acid replaced by another.

Signature
Poutnik
The best depends on how the best is defined.