Natural Science Forum / Physics / Fusion / October 2008

I hope I am wrong also, but the evidence is piling up in support of
that barrier.
The LHC is in fact a tokamak, only a unique tokamak in that, unlike
JET,
allows us to look inside and peer inside during a event. Something
that JET
did not allow.

Those who have no mind for scientific thought or thinking can ask
themselves
a simple question which will convince them. Suppose there was no
barrier
to fusion. Then the next higher level of energy is matter-to-
antimatter. So
in a thousand or ten thousand year, hence, human civilization, would
they be going
after a Matter-Antimatter Power Station the same way we are going
after
a Fusion Power Station? No, because the cost of making
antimatter proves that there cannot be such a Power Station. So a
barrier
exists somewhere between Fission Power and Matter-Antimatter Power.

How long have we been at this fusion game and how much success? It
is the longest standing physics work in human history and our success
has been only 64% breakeven with JET. That is strong evidence to
support the idea that the barrier is actually 2/3 breakeven.

I place the barrier at 2/3 Fusion breakeven from the Maxwell
Equations.

The LHC can probably prove the Fusion Barrier Principle to be 2/3
breakeven.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

When I succeed in repeating a successful experiment carried out at RSRS 40
years ago.

We did it at RSRS 40 years ago. The authorities scrapped it because of the
Petrol lobby and because the mathematical analysis was too hard.