Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Fusion / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Korean Atom Bomb

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bleeding Scalp - 14 Oct 2006 15:18 GMT
It does sound like the Koreans are using the new technology electrically
ignited "hydrogen" bomb.

These can be made from a yield of a few pounds of TNT to megatons of TNT for
less than $10 and are only a few grams. A 1 KT bomb would be made from about
0.25 g of the nuclear fuel.

A normal watch type lithium battery is sufficient to ignite it.

All armies are re-equipping; wars will never be the same again.

Signature

Bleeding Scalp

David Spain - 16 Oct 2006 22:09 GMT
> It does sound like the Koreans are using the new technology electrically
> ignited "hydrogen" bomb.

Gee, they're still clunking around with "electrical" hydrogen bombs?
I thought it was all based on thought wave technology. AKA wishful thinking...

> These can be made from a yield of a few pounds of TNT to megatons of TNT for
> less than $10 and are only a few grams. A 1 KT bomb would be made from about
> 0.25 g of the nuclear fuel.

Reference please?

A 1/2 KT yield sounds like a dud to me. They don't have the assembly physics
down yet. Which is truly astounding if this *was* a U-235 based bomb as was
reported. They need to increase the food rations of their "calculators".

Dave
Bleeding Scalp - 17 Oct 2006 05:49 GMT
There was no fissile material present.

Signature

Bleeding Scalp

>> It does sound like the Koreans are using the new technology electrically
>> ignited "hydrogen" bomb.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Dave
David Spain - 17 Oct 2006 16:11 GMT
> There was no fissile material present.

I cannot refute that statement because I do not know the
results of the radioisotope samples taken by the US after
the test. But it can be determined via scientific means.

Clearly it was sufficient for Negroponte to declare
it was an atomic test.

To my knowledge no one, other than yourself, has asserted
it was "hydrogen" related.

Still awaiting your references...

Dave
Bleeding Scalp - 18 Oct 2006 20:56 GMT
Look at the UK patent site there is a patent for an electrically ignited
hydrogen bomb. there is only a tiny amount of hydrogen in the detonator the
main charge is another material only known to you.

Signature

Bleeding Scalp

>> There was no fissile material present.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Dave
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.