Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Meteorology / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

WARNING: These people now have their hands all over your jobs and paypackets.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
0Z0NB - 06 Jul 2008 05:40 GMT
Switching off Victoria

July 06, 2008

It's utterly unbelievable that the Rudd Government should be
contemplating making bankrupt the stations that provide more than 90 per
cent of Victoria's power:

Although careful to respect the Federal Government's process, Victorian
Energy Minister Peter Batchelor appears increasingly nervous in his
public comments. Asked if one of the state's brown coal generators will
be forced to close prematurely, he said: "It depends on the nature of
the emissions trading scheme (introduced)."

If it's one like Garnaut actually recommends - with no compensation to
power stations for wiping billions off their value - the generators are
cactus. And here is Kevin Rudd's modus operandi writ large and
destructive: process over purpose. What possible good could there be to
cause such an economic catastrophe in this state?

But Rudd's guru has a solution of the kind the Soviet Union would have
suggested:

In his report, Professor Garnaut said $1 billion to $2 billion of the
emissions trading scheme proceeds should be invested in clean coal
technologies, matched dollar for dollar by the companies. If clean coal
worked, he said, the Latrobe Valley would heave a "prosperous and
expansive future". If it didn't, money from the scheme should be used to
help retrain workers and to help the valley community survive the brave
new world of zero emissions.

Hey, let the Government spend a couple of billion of taxpayers' money,
and another couple of billion of the bosses', on a yet-to-be proved
"solution" many experts say is pie in the sky. And then, $4 billion
later, let's give the unemployed some handouts.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/switc
hing_off_victoria/

Signature


Warmest Regards

Bonzo

"From 1870 to 1900, we had global cooling, then we had significant
global warming from about 1910 to 1945. That global warming is not
accompanied by any significant rise in CO2, so you can't blame CO2. Then
CO2 increased while we had global cooling. You can't blame that on CO2.
It's only been the last 30 years there's been correlation between CO2
and global warming" Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
Western Washington University

Vote out Brendan Nelson - 06 Jul 2008 09:09 GMT
> Switching off Victoria
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/switc
hing_off_victoria/
 

Those pollution plants should not of been built in the first place.
There is no room for coal in the 21'st Century or beyond.
Polly the Parrot - 06 Jul 2008 14:08 GMT
> Those pollution plants should not of been built in the first place.
> There is no room for coal in the 21'st Century or beyond.

So why is your beloved lefty turd Labor Party building another one in
Victoria?
Eeyore - 06 Jul 2008 19:12 GMT
> Those pollution plants should not of been built in the first place.
> There is no room for coal in the 21'st Century or beyond.

Coal plants can be suitably cleaned up these days with the like of flue gas desulphurisation and
electrostatic precipitators.

Graham
Mauried - 07 Jul 2008 00:28 GMT
>> Those pollution plants should not of been built in the first place.
>> There is no room for coal in the 21'st Century or beyond.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Graham

If the plants should not have been built in the first place then what
should have built instead.
Where can I buy a renewable Base Load 5 GW power plant from as thats
whats needed to replace the coal plants.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.