Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Meteorology / January 2009

But huge amounts of desert will turn green once they get enough
rainfall. This green, well-watered land can then be farmed.

Mud tends to make good farmland. What makes this particular mud
"impassable" rather than "farmable" mud?

Tens of millions of square kilometres of mud sound much better able to
bear life than tens of millions of square kilometres of permafrost.

Let me put it another way: does anyone seriously claim that permafrost
is better for life than a muddy plain? If for some reasons humans
didn't tend the mud and just never went there, it would generate lots
of biomass all by itself like a sort of gigantic nature reserve. Is
that bad for life on Earth?

ROTFLMAO

The unquestioning faith in debunked climate models never ceases to amaze me!
But then, I don't have the blinkers of a hidden socialist agenda on me!!

The Sorry History Of Climate Model Predictions

16 Sep 2008

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
expecting realistic results."

The computer models upon which the UN's climate panel unwisely founds its
entire case have failed and failed and failed again to predict major events
in the real climate.

a. The models have not projected the current multidecadal stasis in "global
warming":

b. no rise in temperatures since 1998; falling temperatures since late 2001;
temperatures not expected to set a new record until 2015 (Keenlyside et al.,
2008).

c. nor (until trained ex post facto) did they predict the fall in TS from
1940-1975;

d. nor 50 years' cooling in Antarctica (Doran et al., 2002) and the Arctic
(Soon, 2005);

e. nor the absence of ocean warming since 2003 (Lyman et al., 2006;
Gouretski & Koltermann, 2007);

f. nor the behavior of the great ocean oscillations (Lindzen, 2007),

g. nor the magnitude nor duration of multi-century events such as the
Mediaeval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age;

h. nor the decline since 2000 in atmospheric methane concentration (IPCC,
2007);

i. nor the active 2004 hurricane season;

j. nor the inactive subsequent seasons;

k. nor the UK flooding of 2007 (the Met Office had forecast a summer of
prolonged droughts only six weeks previously);

l. nor the solar Grand Maximum of the past 70 years, during which the Sun
was more active, for longer, than at almost any similar period in the past
11,400 years (Hathaway, 2004; Solanki et al., 2005);

m. nor the consequent surface "global warming" on Mars, Jupiter, Neptune's
largest moon, and even distant Pluto;

n. nor the eerily-continuing 2006 solar minimum;

o. nor the consequent, precipitate decline of ~0.8 °C in surface temperature
from January 2007 to May 2008 that has canceled out almost all of the
observed warming of the 20th century.

http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1803

Warmest Regards

Bonzo

ROTFLMAO

I'll take it off your hands for a fee to spare you the "rising sea
levels"!!!!

Any other AGW whackos out there who want to offload their beachfront
property?

There should be a concentration of these Hollywood whackos on Malibu beach
desperateley trying to offload their beach front properties, I'm sure.

They make enough noise about "global warming"!

So where are they?

Come on, show us all the courage of your convictions!!!

Warmest Regards

Bonzo

By the time they realize the problem and sell, you won't want to buy.

Or, there could be this idea. Since we are trying to reduce our
effects on the Earth, it's possible the problem could wind down and
nothing will happen. At which point the "Limbaughs" of the world will
say; "See? Told you there was nothing to it!"