> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me some biochemical test of Actinomyces pyogenes?? Or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> something.... I would appreciate very much!!
> Thank You
Come on!! Even a simple Google search produced 35,300 hits! And if you
cannot differentiate between actinomyces and strep, you haven't learned
anything in your microbiology class.
Do not expect us to do your homework for you.

Signature
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
Professor of Microbiology
Idaho State University
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Vanessa - 04 Jul 2007 11:14 GMT
If it is that easy, does anybody knows if Actinomyces pyogenes is PYR
( L-pyroglutamic acid beta-naphthylamide ) positive ??? Thats the only
thing i'm asking!!! And of course i haved search in google.... and in
other places and in books.... and i cant find it.... Thanks anyway!!!
Larry Farrell - 04 Jul 2007 18:45 GMT
> If it is that easy, does anybody knows if Actinomyces pyogenes is PYR
> ( L-pyroglutamic acid beta-naphthylamide ) positive ??? Thats the only
> thing i'm asking!!! And of course i haved search in google.... and in
> other places and in books.... and i cant find it.... Thanks anyway!!!
If that is all you needed to know, why didn't you ask that at the outset
instead of asking if "anyone knows anything about A. pyogenes?"

Signature
Larry D. Farrell, Ph.D.
Professor of Microbiology
Idaho State University
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
JEDilworth - 05 Jul 2007 05:21 GMT
It's probably not a test that is used to identify A. pyogenes, which is
why you can't find it.
We use PYR mostly to identify enterococci. It CAN be used for Strep.
pyogenes, but only as an ancillary test if you need it. I think it can
be used to differentiate a few gram negatives also.
Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
Microbiology
> If it is that easy, does anybody knows if Actinomyces pyogenes is PYR
> ( L-pyroglutamic acid beta-naphthylamide ) positive ???
John Gentile - 06 Jul 2007 00:49 GMT
You're right Judy. The identification should have started with a Gram
stain - the Gram pos rods bring the organim id down a different path.

Signature
John Gentile MS, M(ASCP)
Laboratory Information Mgr.
VA Medical Center
Providence, RI
yjgent@cox.net
> It's probably not a test that is used to identify A. pyogenes, which is
> why you can't find it.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> If it is that easy, does anybody knows if Actinomyces pyogenes is PYR
>> ( L-pyroglutamic acid beta-naphthylamide ) positive ???
JEDilworth - 06 Jul 2007 02:49 GMT
We've all been down the "wrong path" because we didn't make a simple
gram stain. It is extremely important to know what morphology you are
dealing with before you proceed. I've been burned in the past so I make
this a necessary step. I gram smear any coagulase negative
"staphylococci" to make SURE they are indeed cocci. Every once in awhile
I end up with diphtheroids. Alpha "strep" can fool you and turn out to
be Lactobacilli (long gram positive rods).
I've seen "mycobacteria" on a Lowenstein Jensen slant turn out to be
yeast because the tech just assumed that anything that grew on an LJ was
automatically acid fast and sent it out for identification. Our Ph.D.
just shook his head at that one. It makes the sender look pretty dumb.
So, to all you students and newbie micro techs out there: when in doubt,
stain your colony to find out what you have before you proceed. You'll
be glad you did.
Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
Microbiology
> You're right Judy. The identification should have started with a Gram
> stain - the Gram pos rods bring the organism id down a different path.
Actinomyces are gram positive rods. Streptococci are gram positive cocci
in chains. S, pyogenes is beta hemolytic on 5% TSA sheep blood agar.
S. pyogenes, known otherwise as Group A beta streptococcus, is PYR
positive.
Have you performed a gram stain? What medium are you using to grow the
organisms? Strep can sometimes look a bit elongated on gram smear, but
you should still see some cocci in chains on your smear.
Remember: in microbiology PERFORM A GRAM STAIN when in doubt. It will
clear up LOTS of questions.
I just googled A. pyogenes and got 134,000 (!) hits. Have you thought of
using the internet? A. pyogenes is now known as Arcanobacterium
pyogenes, which I have heard of. Some labs identify these in strep
screen throat cultures; others do not. It has been implicated in throat
infections.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Actinomyces+pyogenes (my google
search).
Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
Microbiology
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me some biochemical test of Actinomyces pyogenes?? Or
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> something.... I would appreciate very much!!
> Thank You
John Gentile - 02 Jul 2007 21:23 GMT
I've run into this organism a couple of times, and the most interesting
case was a positive blood culture. I used a Gram positive rod approach
to the identification, but the hemolysis was not very apparent on the
horse blood agar we were using at the time. After a couple of days we
finally did ID it and also checked the patient's previous cultures. I
found that he had been admitted with a leg wound and a culture of the
wound was reported out as Diphtheroids. I found the original plates and
realized that the tech had missed the hemolysis and didn't go any
further. It made an interesting case for our microbiology rounds.
> Actinomyces are gram positive rods. Streptococci are gram positive
> cocci in chains. S, pyogenes is beta hemolytic on 5% TSA sheep blood
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Judy Dilworth, M.T. (ASCP)
> Microbiology

Signature
John Gentile MS, M(ASCP)
Laboratory Information Mgr.
VA Medical Center
Providence, RI
yjgent@cox.net