Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Microbiology / October 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

long-term memory

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 15 Oct 2004 12:13 GMT
Can anyone help me find out what the nucleus is doing during long-term
memory transcription??
I want to know if anyone has an idea of its structure.  We know what the
chromosome looks like during mitosos of non-neuroonal cells, but what about
memory?? anybody??  Is
the nucleus curled up or has it straightened out??
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 20 Oct 2004 10:34 GMT
presumably the strand in the neuron is still curled up rather than
'inflated' as at metaphase; somehow the neurotransmitters operating via the
synapses are locating the correct base during long term memory activation??

> Can anyone help me find out what the nucleus is doing during long-term
> memory transcription??
> I want to know if anyone has an idea of its structure.  We know what the
> chromosome looks like during mitosos of non-neuroonal cells, but what about
> memory?? anybody??  Is
> the nucleus curled up or has it straightened out??
Randa Wanli - 20 Oct 2004 14:56 GMT
> Can anyone help me find out what the nucleus is doing during long-term
> memory transcription??
> I want to know if anyone has an idea of its structure.  We know what the
> chromosome looks like during mitosos of non-neuroonal cells, but what about
> memory?? anybody??  Is
> the nucleus curled up or has it straightened out??

I want you  to tell me some more about your  message
Randa Wanli - 20 Oct 2004 15:09 GMT
> presumably the strand in the neuron is still curled up rather than
> 'inflated' as at metaphase; somehow the neurotransmitters operating via the
> synapses are locating the correct base during long term memory activation??

what do you mean about strand in the neuron?
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 20 Oct 2004 16:43 GMT
ok, Randa, inside the nucleus, there must be a dna sequence just curled up
'listening' for signals that come in via the synapses.the  there will be a
base that corresponds to each synapse 'somehow'.  this nucleus is inside
each neuron.  what's happening to the dna strand?? is it 'packaged up' or
has it 'stretched out'??

Tony Fleming

> > presumably the strand in the neuron is still curled up rather than
> > 'inflated' as at metaphase; somehow the neurotransmitters operating via the
> > synapses are locating the correct base during long term memory activation??
>
> what do you mean about strand in the neuron?
Mark - 20 Oct 2004 18:39 GMT
> ok, Randa, inside the nucleus, there must be a dna sequence just curled up
> 'listening' for signals that come in via the synapses.the  there will be a
> base that corresponds to each synapse 'somehow'.  this nucleus is inside
> each neuron.  what's happening to the dna strand?? is it 'packaged up' or
> has it 'stretched out'??

In your previous post, are you suggesting that long term memory
is specified in the nucleic acid sequence?

As for the idea that there is a base for each synapse, I think
you have a few misunderstandings of how DNA sequences work to
specify the necessary components of life.
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 20 Oct 2004 23:08 GMT
well, mark, i'll agree with you its different; but how do see it otherwise
tthan synapse-base specific signalling?? the sequence is being transcribed
during a synapse response.

Tony

> > ok, Randa, inside the nucleus, there must be a dna sequence just curled up
> > 'listening' for signals that come in via the synapses.the  there will be a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> you have a few misunderstandings of how DNA sequences work to
> specify the necessary components of life.
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 20 Oct 2004 23:26 GMT
the neuron is the mediator between the cell-specific action and the memory
> well, mark, i'll agree with you its different; but how do see it otherwise
> tthan synapse-base specific signalling?? the sequence is being transcribed
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> > you have a few misunderstandings of how DNA sequences work to
> > specify the necessary components of life.
Mark - 21 Oct 2004 13:40 GMT
I am no expert, but as I understand it the memory has something
to do with the patterns among neurons, and the connections that
form between them. Clearly the synapses are important in
signalling, i doubt there could be brain function without
synaptic signalling. Genes are probably expressed in response to
synaptic signals (again, i am not an expert on that), but if this
happens I suspect it will be via the action of a network of
sensory and regulatory proteins, which turn on/off genes as
required. I personally know of no evidence that any specific base
in DNA is corresponding to a particular synapse. Don't forget,
the DNA in the brain is exactly the same DNA as in the rest of
your body.

> the neuron is the mediator between the cell-specific action and the memory
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>>>you have a few misunderstandings of how DNA sequences work to
>>>specify the necessary components of life.
Randa Wanli - 21 Oct 2004 14:36 GMT
> the neuron is the mediator between the cell-specific action and the memory
> > well, mark, i'll agree with you its different; but how do see it otherwise
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> > > you have a few misunderstandings of how DNA sequences work to
> > > specify the necessary components of life.

i would like to ask you to tell if you are interesting in the matter
of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 22 Oct 2004 03:59 GMT
of course randa; my interests are as a mathematician and biophysicist;
knowledge in this area will no doubt lead to some amazing breakthroughs in
treating addictions, dementia ; and learning to name a few

of course i sense your question is centred around any malicious use of such
knowledge; and like the atomic scientists before and after WWII i sincerely
hope we are wise enough to alert the population of any potential for
'psychobiological' warfare;

God forbid, eh??

sincerely Tony

> > the neuron is the mediator between the cell-specific action and the memory
> > > well, mark, i'll agree with you its different; but how do see it otherwise
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
> do with .
N10 - 23 Oct 2004 02:15 GMT
What is everyone talking about here ?

There seems to be a premise being offered  (unproven and undocumented ?)
that in some way the complex human or mammalian experience of memeory
invovles storage of data in DNA and that this phenomenon  is in some way
mediated by synaptic interactions and DNA.

Well firstly may I ask if any data exists to support such a proposition. I
personally beleive no data will be offered. Work back in 60's clearly
demonstrated the inabilty  of any  know biological molecule to be  capable
of storing the kind byte stream required to encode the scope and volume  of
information  involved with complex memeory streams. Relatedly there was of
course the factor of speed of ~'translation'~  during recall (of memeory)
which ( on occasion  is near instantaneous) can not  be reconcilled or
explained by DNA functionality as we know it.

Its given that on a purely stimulus response basis ( such as hormonal
mediated behaviour or reactions in mammals)  there are models where gene
transcription etc etc is mediated by communciation of  environmental data.
This is bargain basement memeory not really in the league of complex
cerebral algorthms.

So is it possible to clarify what the author of the orgional post is
actually talking about and then perhapes the converstation might go some
where constructive. Its an interesting topic. Please do not mention triple
stranded DNA (GASP !)or I will leave the planet.

Yours

N10

> of course randa; my interests are as a mathematician and biophysicist;
> knowledge in this area will no doubt lead to some amazing breakthroughs in
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>> do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 24 Oct 2004 06:16 GMT
dear N10, limbic lesion, mr anonymous (no sarcasm intended-just a friendly
greeting) , read the following paper by west etal.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
1572963&dopt=Abstract


especially read the discussion that the route of the calcium entry matters
to neuronal transcription and some of the previous discussion on p. 11025.

a colleague and i have recently put forward a hypothesis that
the photon has a substructure and has a spectroscopy associated with it
http://www.cymatics.org.uk/articles/current-events-bems-2004.html there's a
pdf of the presented paper there too.

in the paper is some work on a new theory called EM self-field theory which
solves maxwell's equations via the FIELDS not the potentials; this maths
solution translates across to the photon as well as hydrogen atom, so a
challenger to quauntum theory and its uncertainty principle.

so what i'm saying is NOT that there's a way of storing data in DNA but
that's not a bad idea (so tell me more 'cos i think it's possible that data
CAN be stored inside the quark region inside the gluon structures).  what
i'm saying is that ca 2+ and its fields can signal the part of the genetic
code that is required by the specific synapse!!!!!!!

> What is everyone talking about here ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>> do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 24 Oct 2004 07:05 GMT
so, i take it that the dna is curled up inside the nuicleus in answer to my
first question;

> dear N10, limbic lesion, mr anonymous (no sarcasm intended-just a friendly
> greeting) , read the following paper by west etal.
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
>>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>>> do with .
N10 - 24 Oct 2004 11:46 GMT
Dear TF

Thanks for the refrences. They took me all morning to read and were very
interesting indeed and of course explain your need for your question and a
possible and elegant protomodel for memory. Quatum memmory ...way to go as
they say :)

I apologise if I seemed  rude or dismissive . Good luck with your research.

Best N10

> dear N10, limbic lesion, mr anonymous (no sarcasm intended-just a friendly
> greeting) , read the following paper by west etal.
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
>>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>>> do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 24 Oct 2004 14:17 GMT
dear N10, that's a very kind reply; thanks!! actually we all take part in
the 'scientific method' and we need to walk the gauntlet of opinion and
hopefully we get garlands and not brickbats; but nevertheless the criticizor
is an important entity in the overall process. so thanks for the kind
wishes.

you mentioned some work back in the 60's; i'd be grateful for any more info
you might be able to furnish.  especially references to papers which i might
be able to get a hold of at the local library.

i personally think the work on EMSFT is a happy day for us all as it
presents many new possibilities in microbiology.

in the area of memory and learning, it might herald some amazing steps
forward towards understanding the physics of our own minds!!

cheers Tony

> Dear TF
>
[quoted text clipped - 119 lines]
>>>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>>>> do with .
N10 - 24 Oct 2004 21:18 GMT
Dear TF

I was an undergraduate in those days so and Ive still retained my notes etc
etc so I do what I can over next week to obtain data which you might find
usefull.

Have you read any of Peter Shelldrake's books or papers ?

Best N10

> dear N10, that's a very kind reply; thanks!! actually we all take part in
> the 'scientific method' and we need to walk the gauntlet of opinion and
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
>>>>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>>>>> do with .
N10 - 24 Oct 2004 22:06 GMT
Addendum

oops Rupert not Peter

Youmight care to read this

http://www.sheldrake.org/intro/index3.html

Best N10

> Dear TF
>
[quoted text clipped - 152 lines]
>>>>>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>>>>>> do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 26 Oct 2004 00:24 GMT
what is interesting is how this might be related to schizophrenia; if the
signals evoke the incorrect long-term memory causing an incorrect
transcriptional response; this cause incorrect visual and audio memories to
be processed; and any weak signal could evoke similar 'spurious' audiovisual
memories.

> Addendum
>
[quoted text clipped - 167 lines]
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 29 Oct 2004 00:39 GMT
such as dyslexia?? and what about autism??

> what is interesting is how this might be related to schizophrenia; if the
> signals evoke the incorrect long-term memory causing an incorrect
[quoted text clipped - 176 lines]
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> do with .
tfleming1@hotkey.net.au - 26 Oct 2004 00:51 GMT
> Dear TF
>
[quoted text clipped - 152 lines]
>>>>>>> of the long term memory please tell me exactly what are you going to
>>>>>>> do with .
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.