Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Microbiology / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

3D images for microbiological objects

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tontoko Hirorin - 22 Jan 2005 05:52 GMT
Here various microscopic objects can be seen stereoscopically!

http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/stereographer/gallery/microscope/microscope.htm
Scott Coutts - 22 Jan 2005 14:56 GMT
> Here various microscopic objects can be seen stereoscopically!
>
> http://139.134.5.123/tiddler2/stereographer/gallery/microscope/microscope.htm

I always like stereo images, but I much prefer 'real' stereo images
rather than ones that have been produced artificially from a single
image. They're much harder to do on a microscope though! I had a go
recently and didnt get much depth effect because of the very short depth
of field of the scope I was using.

Cheers,

Scott.
Tontoko Hirorin - 23 Jan 2005 00:25 GMT
Of course everyone prefers real stereo image rather than "faked" one. But the images I've shown in the site are based on some
mathematical model, while as you've said it is pretty difficult to get real stereo microscopic image due to technical problems. So I
thought my method might be useful to make microscopic objects more tangible.

> > Here various microscopic objects can be seen stereoscopically!
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Scott.
Scott Coutts - 23 Jan 2005 00:45 GMT
Yeah, sure. Dont get me wrong, I was criticising the images as bad or
invaluable!

Cheers,

Scott.

> Of course everyone prefers real stereo image rather than "faked" one.
> But the images I've shown in the site are based on some mathematical
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> Scott.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.