Thanks for the reply Bob. Several years ago in my dissertation work, I
saw that selegiline was extensively metabolized by something in the
building. I am hoping to determine if microorganisms were doing the
metabolizing by sampling the bacteria that may be found in the lab
(walls, benches, and air). So that's why the selection of those areas
was chosen.
If I spike the bacteria at a low concentration, say in the ng/mL range,
I hope there will be minimal toxicity to the organism while still being
concentrated enough to produce and for me to see pg/mL of potential
metabolites, similar to spiking live cells.
The other goals would be as you recommended, to select an organism that
will grow on a C or N source and possibly produce metabolites for us
for qualitative mass spec analysis and as a low-cost alternative to
having metabolites synthesized. I don't expect glucuronides or other
phase 2 metabolites, but demethylations and oxidations were observed
with the selegiline. I was trying to use strains that were freely
available from the lab environment, but I can check out bacteria supply
houses as well (recommend a good one?).
Another goal is to account for metabolite contamination found in mass
spec labs where there should be no metabolites should be present.
Thanks for any assistance or tips you are able to provide. Hopefully
this description better describes what I am looking to test.
Best Regards,
Bill
>Thanks for the reply Bob. Several years ago in my dissertation work, I
>saw that selegiline was extensively metabolized by something in the
>building. I am hoping to determine if microorganisms were doing the
>metabolizing by sampling the bacteria that may be found in the lab
>(walls, benches, and air). So that's why the selection of those areas
>was chosen.
Ah, so you have something of an existence theorem. That helps.
Do you know what the metabolites were (or simply that the drug
disappeared)?
Do you know that the lab area you are currently sampling does this (or
only that some previous lab did)?? That might be important. If the
latter, you might want to do some preliminaries, at about the level of
what you saw earlier. Spending time trying to isolate something makes
more sense if you know if it is there. Further, you can do some
preliminary studies even without isolating the strain. For example,
you might want to know whether it will metabolize the drug when grown
in rich media (such as Luria broth). It might not, requiring that you
do the work with a defined (and minimal) medium. If selection is
involved (and it may or may not be), this may mean using defined
medium even for initial isolation. In many cases, unusual metabolisms
require something resembling starvation.
>If I spike the bacteria at a low concentration, say in the ng/mL range,
>I hope there will be minimal toxicity to the organism while still being
>concentrated enough to produce and for me to see pg/mL of potential
>metabolites, similar to spiking live cells.
Reasonable, but be prepared to explore.
>The other goals would be as you recommended, to select an organism that
>will grow on a C or N source and possibly produce metabolites for us
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>available from the lab environment, but I can check out bacteria supply
>houses as well (recommend a good one?).
In US? The big one is the ATCC. I think they will even offer advice.
Check their web site.
>Another goal is to account for metabolite contamination found in mass
>spec labs where there should be no metabolites should be present.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Bill
I quickly checked both PubMed and BIOSIS, using very simple search:
selegiline AND bacteria. Few hits, and only one looked relevant. From
the abstract, I couldn't tell whether the drug was a substrate or an
inhibitor.
Wouters J, Perpete P, Hayen P, Anceau N, Durant F.
Kinetic characterization of tyramine oxidase of Arthrobacter
species.
Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1994 Mar;32(4):737-43.
PMID: 8038724 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Note that the questions "Who is eating the drug in the lab?" and "Can
we find strains to produce metabolites?" may call for somewhat
different approaches.
The lab bugs may be a place to start even if the main goal is the
metabolites. But I would be inclined to also go to soil. Diverse soil
bacteria, including Pseudomonas and Arthrobacter, tend to chew on a
wide range of organics.
Someone suggested using streak plates, rather than colony count
plates. As you know, you will need to make a range of dilutions to get
what you want from colony count plates. The streak plates allow you to
observe a range of densities all on one plate. Since you don't need
the quantitation of a plate count, just colonies, it would be
reasonable to use streak plates. Not a big issue for a small project,
but less work if you are doing much.
bob
Bill - 30 Mar 2005 18:08 GMT
We found selegiline was metabolized to the same 3 metabolites as
produced by humans; desmethyl selegiline, methamphetamine, and
amphetamine (must be a biker group of bacteria). Pseudomonas sp. from
ATCC feeds on nicotine and similar molecules I would assume so that is
exactly the road that I will continue to search. I have some LB plates
started and to be honest, identification and isolation would be an
added bonus; any activity on selegiline would be enough to confirm my
hypothesis. Thank you again for the great information.... I've got my
homework to do and some experiments to try and will post some results
as the experiments progress.
Bill
Bob - 06 Apr 2005 04:50 GMT
>We found selegiline was metabolized to the same 3 metabolites as
>produced by humans;
That opens up another possible approach. Since you are (at least to
some extent) looking for certain specific reactions, you might check
the databases for bacteria that have those enzymes.
Now, that is a little harder than it sounds. You do not need the
enzyme to be substrate specific, but it must do the right reaction. So
you are looking for an enzyme type, more than a specific reaction.
bob
>desmethyl selegiline, methamphetamine, and
>amphetamine (must be a biker group of bacteria). Pseudomonas sp. from
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Bill