Read this article (www.zeiss.de/C12567A100537AB9/allBySubject/FramedNews3).
It's like the very early days of semi-conductor, you just don't know what's
gonna happen next. Welcome to the future.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Malcolm Stewart - 11 Oct 2006 18:44 GMT
> Read this article
> (www.zeiss.de/C12567A100537AB9/allBySubject/FramedNews3).
>
> It's like the very early days of semi-conductor, you just don't know
> what's gonna happen next. Welcome to the future.
Thanks for the pointer - I remember when it was first announced, and
wondering what next.
(I also remember my <prestigious> university electricity and magnetism text
book saying with great confidence that transistors had no future, being
limited to audio frequencies only! And that was in 1959... )

Signature
M Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Neil Bates - 31 Dec 2006 02:16 GMT
> Read this article
> (www.zeiss.de/C12567A100537AB9/allBySubject/FramedNews3).
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Kevin Cunningham
> SMS
A question, based on this statement:
"Unlike common optical materials or "normal" crystals, optical metamaterials
display exceptional properties such as, for instance, a negative refractive
index. This offers extensive capabilities for the use of these materials.
With their aid, "perfect" lenses can be produced in which diffraction does
not limit resolution. One conceivable possibility is new lithography
techniques for the fabrication of computer chips."
If so, how (and I'm not saying they can, just challenging about it) do such
lenses avoid breaking resolution rules that seem needed to preserve quantum
limitations on knowledge (consider the famous microscope example used by
Heisenberg by illustrate his famous uncertainty principle.)