Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wild Stereoscope Models

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Too_Many_Tools - 18 Aug 2007 19:26 GMT
I am interested in buying a Wild stereoscope of the M5/M7/M8 series.

Could someone discuss the different versions of these lines of scopes?

I recently saw a listing for a pair of Wild M7A and Wild M7S
stereoscopes...what are the differences between these scopes? Are
there
more variations of this particular scope?

Also are there similar variations of the M5 and M8 scopes?

Finally is there a web page that discusses the stereoscopes that Wild
has produced over the years?

Thanks

TMT
Kevin Cunningham - 21 Aug 2007 13:12 GMT
> I am interested in buying a Wild stereoscope of the M5/M7/M8 series.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> TMT

I don't know how much good this will do but what the heck.  The M7 and
M8 have much wider zoom ranges along with Galilean construction.  They
are kinda finicky to work on, you have to get the tension between the
zoom parts and the rotary parts right on the M7.  The M8 was an
upgrade so the mag could be adjusted of the the side which is what you
need in semi-conductor production.

If you need reflected light only or you can add transmitted light
later try these guys
(www.capovani.com/dp/cat/107/63160/ilist.cfm?LCl=342&menuid=m_2_2_1).

Whats really amazing is the number of additions you can make to Wild
(Leica) stereos.  Every thing you ever wanted and probably more.
Thats one of the real advantages of a Wild.

Thanks,

Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Too_Many_Tools - 22 Aug 2007 04:53 GMT
> > I am interested in buying a Wild stereoscope of the M5/M7/M8 series.
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks for the response Kevin...it is appreciated.

The large number of accessories is one of the reasons why I plan on
buying a Wild.

TMT
Victor - 22 Aug 2007 17:07 GMT
If the large number of accessories available is one of the principal
motivators to buying the Wild scope, then I would strongly recommend
shying away from the M5 and M7 and "focus" on the M8.

The reason is that the M5 (and M5A) along with the M7 have a wider
distance in the optical path (the distance between the parallel beam
paths) than the current incarnations of Leica stereomicroscopes.
Leica's been really good about remaining consistent with their
accessories since the discontinuation of the M3/M8 series.   Every
single current accessory (with the exception of the objectives) will
work with the M8, or the M3, whereas with the M5 and M7, you're
restricted to discontinued accessories which are much more limited.

I would recommend an M3, M8, or even a more current MS or MZ series
stereomicroscope.   This would allow you to take advantage of the full
line of accessories both now and in the future.

Victor Casas
Mikron Instruments
Too_Many_Tools - 22 Aug 2007 20:18 GMT
> If the large number of accessories available is one of the principal
> motivators to buying the Wild scope, then I would strongly recommend
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Victor Casas
> Mikron Instruments

Excellent point..thanks for raising it.

I did not know that the M7 shared the M5's wider distance.

One of the reasons why I am focusing on the availability of
accessories is in the past I have had systems worth many dollars whose
useful was seriously diminished because of the inability to purchase a
critical accessory.

Support is paramount after the initial sale.

I am trying to stay with the Wild models because of their reputation
of being "better" than the newer Leica models...true?

TMT
Kevin Cunningham - 24 Aug 2007 13:54 GMT
> > If the large number of accessories available is one of the principal
> > motivators to buying the Wild scope, then I would strongly recommend
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> TMT

Over the years production of what used to be Wild was moved to
Singapore and no changes were made.  The Singaporeans were trained by
the Swiss and Germans, they make darn good stuff.  There isn't really
a difference.  The name change was made and only the the product
managers gave a darn.

Its not the first time.  E. Leitz used to have plants in Canada and
Portugal.

Thanks,

Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Too_Many_Tools - 24 Aug 2007 19:10 GMT
> > > If the large number of accessories available is one of the principal
> > > motivators to buying the Wild scope, then I would strongly recommend
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hmmm...so you are saying that the Wild labeled scopes are the same as
the Leica labeled ones?

TMT
Kevin Cunningham - 25 Aug 2007 18:00 GMT
> > > > If the large number of accessories available is one of the principal
> > > > motivators to buying the Wild scope, then I would strongly recommend
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> TMT

Yep, change over from Wild to E. Leitz and Leica happened one day, no
change in production planning or techniques.

Thanks,

Kevin Cunningham
SMS
blackie85746@msn.com - 24 Aug 2007 06:16 GMT
>I am interested in buying a Wild stereoscope of the M5/M7/M8 series.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>TMT
The M7 has the exact same spacing as the M3 and M8.  The M7S is
essentially the same as the M7A except that the  objective lens group
is movable on the M7S.  This allows the observer to use the scope in
either : 1) The standard configuration (left amd right optical path
displaced from the centerline of the objective group).  2) Left
optical path only (centerline of left optical path coincident with
centerline of objective lens group).  This allows for a parallax free
view amd allows epi-illumination into deep holes.
 There are other  differences between the M3, M7 and M8:
1) The cam/ramp mechanism is different on all three scopes - this is
only of interest to a Tech.
2) The M8 objective is a Plan. This might be of interest to you if a
very flat field is required.
3) The M3 also came in a M3C variation with fixed lenses and only one
moving part.  Magnification is in discreet steps. This may interest
you if you need a scope that can take a little rougher handling.
 The M5 does indeed have a wider spacing of the optical paths.


Too_Many_Tools - 24 Aug 2007 19:06 GMT
On Aug 24, 12:16 am, blackie85...@msn.com wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:26:56 -0700, Too_Many_Tools
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks for the info...it is appreciated.

Any idea why the spacing on the optical paths were changed from the M5
(wider) to the M3/7/8 (narrower) series?

TMT
Too_Many_Tools - 25 Aug 2007 18:01 GMT
On Aug 24, 12:16 am, blackie85...@msn.com wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:26:56 -0700, Too_Many_Tools
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Another question....do the same accessories like optional lenses fit
the M3/7/8 scopes?

I am assuming that the M5 accessories are unique to only that
scope...true?

Thanks

TMT
Victor - 27 Aug 2007 16:16 GMT
> On Aug 24, 12:16 am, blackie85...@msn.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

The M8 has a unique objective, the others are interchangeable.
Too_Many_Tools - 27 Aug 2007 20:59 GMT
> > On Aug 24, 12:16 am, blackie85...@msn.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Thanks Victor...so the M8 uses its own specialized accessory optics
while the M7 and M5 can use the same accessory optics which are not
usable on the M8?

The  reason why I ask is that I thought some ot the M8 accessories
(phototube) would work on the M7 and not on the M5.

TMT
blackie85746@msn.com - 28 Aug 2007 05:20 GMT
>> > On Aug 24, 12:16 am, blackie85...@msn.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
>TMT

TMT,  The Wild M8 can use all ot the intermediate tube accessories
that are used on the M3 and M7 series.  You expressed interest in a
phototube; that would work just fine. The only intermediate accessory
that would be prroblematic would be the vertical illuminator.  The
illuminator has polarizers in the optical path and requires a 1/4 wave
plate to change linear polarized light to circular polarized light.
The wave plate holder attaches to the objective lens on the M3 and M7.
It will not attach to the M8 as the outside diameter is larger. None
of the accessories that mount on the end of the objective will work on
the M8. That being said, I can only think of one other accessory that
attaches to the lens  (a small mirror for vertical illumination) other
than the aux. objective lenses (this is another consideration).  
Jay Stanley - 31 Aug 2007 03:02 GMT
What about some of the Motic parts that are supposed to fit the Wild's.
Jay
Jay Stanley - 31 Aug 2007 03:04 GMT
What about some of the Motic parts that are supposed to fit the Wild's.
Jay
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.