 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / March 2008Zeiss Photomicroscope III and MC-63(a)
A question - can someone tell me what I would need to add a MC-63(a) on top of the PhotomicIII? What intermediate tube, what optics would be required? Or would you have a better idea to take 4x5 inch micrographs on the PmicIII? Thanks G.Nyman >A question - can someone tell me what I would need to add a MC-63(a) on top >of the PhotomicIII? What intermediate tube, what optics would be required? >Or would you have a better idea to take 4x5 inch micrographs on the PmicIII? >Thanks >G.Nyman Why would you fool around with these items? I dumped MC-63 bodies and MC-100 controllers since there was no interest in film. Go digital. Kiss French. Drink California. gary at gaugler dot com > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:07:36 +0100, "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > gary at gaugler dot com Couldn't agree more! Were would you get film and processing? Kevin Cunningham SMS gentlemen, I appreciate your recommendation to go digital, but I would like to point out, that compared to a well done 4x5 inch micrograph, a digital micrograph is usually inferior (just try it ). And regarding film and processing - no problem at all here in Austria - everything readily available! but thanks for your reply, if I had enough money to buy a digital medium format back, I would go for it (in parallel) rgds Georg Nyman >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:07:36 +0100, "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > Kevin Cunningham > SMS > gentlemen, I appreciate your recommendation to go digital, but I would like > to point out, that compared to a well done 4x5 inch micrograph, a digital [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > rgds > Georg Nyman If I can disagree with you slightly, the new digital systems offer great versatility, the ability to do one photo or going movie and the quality is better than ever. Now for a new digital, well, its a bit expensive. If you want some guidance on digital and its effect on movies, look at the Red One company. My degree is in Journalism (rd-tv-film) but digital has done away with the degree! If film works for you, great, the cameras are cheap to buy and if you can get film and processing, even better. There is always one last hold out and thats not a bad thing to be. Thanks, Kevin Cunningham SMS > >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:07:36 +0100, "Dr. Georg N.Nyman" > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Kevin Cunningham > > SMS > A question - can someone tell me what I would need to add a MC-63(a) on top > of the PhotomicIII? What intermediate tube, what optics would be required? > Or would you have a better idea to take 4x5 inch micrographs on the PmicIII? > Thanks > G.Nyman See manual, page 7: http://www.zeiss.com/C1256F8500454979/0/5330DFA037F4C069C1256F8F003756CA/$file/g -41-417mc63acamera.pdf |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.