Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

need advice on purchasing used microscopes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Meri - 09 Jul 2008 01:08 GMT
I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
volunteers.

We use them to identify diatoms and dinoflagellates in coastal waters.
I would like them to have a compound scope, with 10, 20, 40, and 10x
ocular;  ideally, a mechanical stage.

Does anyone have any advice?
Kevin Cunningham - 09 Jul 2008 12:45 GMT
> I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
> recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Does anyone have any advice?

I'd urge you to take a look at Spectra Services
(www.spectraservices.com) and Martin Microscopes
(www.martinmicroscopes.com).  They might have the price and the used
product you need.  Of course take a good look around.  Be a bit
suspicious of E-Bay vendors.  Probably you'll find an Olympus CH or a
Nikon Alphaphot for sale, these are good instruments, well built with
great optics.

There are only 4 major quality makers, Olympus, Nikon, Zeiss and
Leica.  The last two are German and better known for their high end
microscopes.

Thanks,

Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Y - 11 Jul 2008 09:33 GMT
> > I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
> > recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Kevin Cunningham
> SMS

I'm sorry but I strongly dissagree on that last statement... There are/were
lots of good quality microscope manufacturers. The difference between those
and the big four isn't a quality issue, but a much smaller range in add-ons.
And a much smaller marketing budget.
Kevin Cunningham - 11 Jul 2008 18:05 GMT
> > > I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
> > > recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> and the big four isn't a quality issue, but a much smaller range in add-ons.
> And a much smaller marketing budget.

The Big 4 that I reference build real microscopes built to last.  The
other makers mostly make crap.  I've been working in this field since
'79 and I've seen far to many messed up and screwed up 2nd tier
systems.  I've seen darn few messed up or screwed up Big 4
instruments.

I'd also point out that most 2nd and 3rd rate makers are made by about
3 plants in China, then a name is applied, like Swift.  If you really
want a cheap microscope, get an Indian make.

Thanks for your views.

Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Y - 15 Jul 2008 14:17 GMT
> > "Kevin Cunningham" <sms...@mindspring.com> wrote in message

news:641eee88-dcc1-4498-be8c-5d8e5b24b6f4@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

> > > > I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
> > > > recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> Kevin Cunningham
> SMS

That's what is called a biased view. All too human, not very scientific.
Kevin Cunningham - 15 Jul 2008 23:16 GMT
> > > "Kevin Cunningham" <sms...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
>
> That's what is called a biased view. All too human, not very scientific.

Thank you for your views.  Actually I make my living fixing
microscopes, I've been doing this for a loooonnnngggg time.  I know
for a fact that the big four make repairable 'scopes with a few bad
apples.  The rest?  Not so good.  Optics are not good, mechanicals not
so good.

Oh, its all science, how else am I going to fix 'scopes?

Thanks,

Kevin Cunningham
SMS
UKOncology@aol.com - 09 Jul 2008 23:43 GMT
> I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
> recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Does anyone have any advice?

May I suggest you get one high end secondhand trinocular instrument
and spend the rest on good quality secondhand binocular ones. There is
much advice to be had re purchase from previous postings in this
group. I suggest a trinocular to allow photography - if you are doing
taxonomy photographs are invaluable. See the micscape website for
abundant advice. I share your interest, and wish you luck!  You should
be able to get plenty of kit s/h for 1k ($ or £?) . If you are in the
UK please advise, and I can point you in the right direction.
If you are in the US, Kevin Cunningham's suggestions are are a good
start. HJ
Y - 11 Jul 2008 09:33 GMT
> I am the volunteer coordinator for phytoplankton monitors.  We
> recently got a small sum of money (not much 1K) to purchase scopes for
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Does anyone have any advice?

Are these assumptions correct:

- Budget of 1K ($,£,Euro?) to buy SEVERAL microscopes to be used by
volunteers?

- No high level diatom identifications (up to subspecies and further), thus
no need to use immersion objectives, high grade optics (apl-achr.
condensers, pl-apo's...) or "special" techniques such as phase contrast?

- Photomicrography not required?

- Microscopes to be used by volunteers so sturdy and
build-like-a-tank-instruments required?

Are the scopes to be used in a (small home) lab environment or are they to
be taken out in the field?

Y.
rene - 11 Jul 2008 17:30 GMT
Inverted microscope!!! Might get tricky for 1K.

René.
Y - 15 Jul 2008 11:28 GMT
Inverted microscope!!! Might get tricky for 1K.

René.

Why not. Some scanning electron microscopes will do the job too and we all
know that these are very cheap these days...

If I was to make the decision, I would buy some sturdy horse shoe shaped
stands with a mirror, equipped with achromats 4,10,40, an uncorrected
condenser (sounds not as nice as an Abbé condenser , I know...) in a
centerable and focussable mount, a 8x Huyghian eypiece and a 10x or 15x
compensation type for the 40x achromat.

Cost second hand: anything between 40 and 100 Euro a piece max for a scope
in good condition. Nice examples of such a scope is the Oly "GB", but
especially in the US they should be proud of  (amongst many others...) their
Spencer microscopes!

If one should think of a more high tech looking stand, I would consider
something like the Will Wetzlar V series. Very nice microscopes, as good as
the Zeiss Standard stands, perhaps even better and these are sold on a
regular basis on Ebay for near to nothing... There's another possibillity to
have much microscope for small bucks.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.