>Hi, looking for a circular polarising filter, about 43mm diameter, screw
>mount, but diameter and mounting not critical as we can machine a
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>cheers and thanks in advance,
Dennis,
The very nature of a polariser is that at least half the light is
removed - a perfect specimen passes all the component of light whose
electric vector is parallel to the plane of least extinction, and
absorbs all the light component whose electric vector is perpendicular
to this direction. This 50% reduction corresponds to a 1-stop reduction
in intensity.
In practice, the polarising material always falls some way short of
perfection. In my experience, a typical photographic polariser will
reduce light intensity by approximately 1.5 stops.
Your best bet would be to look at specialist filter catalogues and find
a Kasemann linear polariser. These use the very best polarising
material, sandwiched between two sheets of optically flat glass and
hermetically sealed to prevent moisture ingress. They cost 2-3 times the
price of commonplace photographic polarisers, but if you want the best
properties these would be the ones. B&W are among the prestigious
manufacturers who make them.
I saw someone say that all Kasemann polarisers are linear, but this is
not so; they are available in linear or circular form. You would need, I
imagine, a linear one - which would probably be a little cheaper.
David

Signature
David Littlewood
Kevin Cunningham - 30 Sep 2004 13:23 GMT
> >Hi, looking for a circular polarising filter, about 43mm diameter, screw
> >mount, but diameter and mounting not critical as we can machine a
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> David
David, good points. Zeiss used to use a prism polarizer but they no longer
make them for the very good reason that they don't polarize as much light.
The good thing about conventional Polaroid film polarizers is the amount of
light polarized is very high. I would be tempted to just buy a good high
quality replacement part from Leica, it fits and works.
Kevin