I am looking at the USB digital microscope eyepiece at
http://www.physlink.com/estore/cart/USBDigitalMicroscopeEyepiece.cfm
Someone on one of these lists recommended it.
It does not say how many megapixels. Home Science Tools, where I bought
some microscope supplies recently, offers a very similar piece (may be the
same model) , for a similar price - and says it is 0.3 megapixels. Or a
resolution of 640 x 480 pixels.
They offer another piece for several hundred dollars that is 1.3 megapixels,
or 1280 X 1024 megapixels.
In my experience, 1.3 megapixels in regular photography is plenty. I have
my 3 or 4 megapixel digital camera set down as far as it will go.
However, for good photos of things under a microscope, don't you need high
resolution. Is the 0.3 megapixel camera good enough, or do I need the 1.3
megapixel one?

Signature
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
tiggernut24@yahoo.com
Kevin Cunningham - 27 Apr 2006 14:14 GMT
> I am looking at the USB digital microscope eyepiece at
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> resolution. Is the 0.3 megapixel camera good enough, or do I need the
> 1.3 megapixel one?
Dora, The 0.3 megapixel camera is fine for fooling around with the 1.3 is
vastly better. In my estimation the more pixels the better. Home Science
Tools are not the people I would buy things from.
Kevin Cunningham
SMS