I am investigating the grinding/polishing systems available for a new SEM
imaging and image analysis facility. I have noted at a facility I visited
the use of the Stuers Tegra system, but this was a high-throughput minerals
processing facility which polished grain mounts exclusively.
For this Struers system, its sample mover is spec'd at 150rpm ... whereas I
note the Struers polishing head for their PdM system specific for minerals
polishing is spec'd at 4rpm. How do I comprehend such a huge difference?
If I anticipate minerals in general (silicates, oxides, sulfides), am I that
much better off with the slow system? (also of note, the Buehler head moves
at 60rpm).
tia ... michael shaffer :o)
www.micro-investigations.com
Henry Barwood - 13 Sep 2004 22:37 GMT
> I am investigating the grinding/polishing systems available for a new SEM
> imaging and image analysis facility. I have noted at a facility I visited
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> tia ... michael shaffer :o)
> www.micro-investigations.com
Speed depends on the materials being polished. For metals, soft ores,
graphite/carbon, etc., low speeds are highly desirable to prevent
plucking and edge rounding. For most normal minerals, higher speeds
are useful for quicker processing. Exceptions are any mineral/compound
with pronounced cleavage.
Henry Barwood
jacques jedwab - 14 Sep 2004 08:19 GMT
IMHO, there is NO standard, uniform, universal polishing system for ALL
minerals, especially when they are mixed. The Vanderwilt system is an
exception and gives excellent results, but you need three huge and heavy
polishing machines, a large room for it, a full time technician, and a
tightly controled embedding with hot epoxy.
J.J.
> I am investigating the grinding/polishing systems available for a new SEM
> imaging and image analysis facility. I have noted at a facility I visited
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> tia ... michael shaffer :o)
> www.micro-investigations.com