Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / August 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CENSORSHIP OF SCIENCE

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MYKEY - 13 Aug 2004 05:15 GMT
The discussion is intended to share information with others
 and learn from others. We want to discuss the zero point
 energy field. Why is the post being edited? All I did was
 show how to make a homemade zeropoint energy field. Whats
 wrong with that? Free energy is out there. Want to talk
 about it? Why supress the discussion? I am not a Phd, just
 an everyday garage scientist. It is these garage scientists
 who need to learn from each other and from the highly
 educated. State your reason for the censorship here...mykey
Andrew Cunningham - 13 Aug 2004 17:19 GMT
I'm interested to know where and when this editing is taking place. Does it
take effect immediately, or after a short duration?

> The discussion is intended to share information with others
>   and learn from others. We want to discuss the zero point
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>   who need to learn from each other and from the highly
>   educated. State your reason for the censorship here...mykey
MYKEY - 13 Aug 2004 23:44 GMT
> I'm interested to know where and when this editing is taking place. Does it
> take effect immediately, or after a short duration?

 dont know when, watching to see if my last post comes thru unedited.
 sorry I did not mean to infer it was you who was doing it.
 the internet here in hawaii has all kinds of qwerks...
Mark Palenik - 14 Aug 2004 05:36 GMT
alt.sci.physics.new-theories is not a moderated group. There is no way any
of this alleged editing is really taking place.

> > I'm interested to know where and when this editing is taking place. Does it
> > take effect immediately, or after a short duration?
> >
>   dont know when, watching to see if my last post comes thru unedited.
>   sorry I did not mean to infer it was you who was doing it.
>   the internet here in hawaii has all kinds of qwerks...
MYKEY - 14 Aug 2004 18:26 GMT
> alt.sci.physics.new-theories is not a moderated group. There is no way any
> of this alleged editing is really taking place.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >   sorry I did not mean to infer it was you who was doing it.
> >   the internet here in hawaii has all kinds of qwerks...

    it takes at least 12 hours for my posts to appear on google
    dont know any more yet  mykey
Mark Palenik - 15 Aug 2004 04:06 GMT
> > alt.sci.physics.new-theories is not a moderated group. There is no way any
> > of this alleged editing is really taking place.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>      it takes at least 12 hours for my posts to appear on google
>      dont know any more yet  mykey

Google only updates its archives every 12 hours or so.  If you use an actual
newsreader, it will only take about 20 minutes or so.  Everything takes
about 12 hours on Google.
Magneto - 15 Aug 2004 04:35 GMT
>>"Mark Palenik" <markpalenik@wideopenwest.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> newsreader, it will only take about 20 minutes or so.  Everything takes
> about 12 hours on Google.

What's really funny is that not only does google take several hours to
retrieve the latest posts, apparently it takes several hours to transmit
the posts you submit through it! So, if you post on google the whole
world will see your message hours before you get to see it...and it's
your own post! I think to save money they are just queuing up messages
to send to other news servers, then in one shot do a massive transaction.
Magneto - 15 Aug 2004 04:42 GMT
>>alt.sci.physics.new-theories is not a moderated group. There is no way any
>>of this alleged editing is really taking place.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>      it takes at least 12 hours for my posts to appear on google
>      dont know any more yet  mykey

If you really think it's being edited, make up a dummy email account on
yahoo or something, then go back to google, write a message that would
normally be censored and post it simultaneously to your sending email
address, this newsgroup, and to the new email address you just made up.
If any one of the three forms you read back are different from the other
two, then you have a right to suspect censorship. Otherwise, you have
nothing to worry about.

On a personal note, I've use the newsgroup posting engine on google, it
sucks. It completely loses about 25% of my messages all the time,
regardless of topic or newsgroup. Like many services on google, I think
this one still has bugs and is still being worked on. Look at their
g-mail for instance, one of their SW bugs gave everyone well over a GB
of mail space! for free!

I really recommend you use another way to post. Google search for
another newsgroup website ;-)
Mark L. Fergerson - 18 Aug 2004 08:22 GMT
> The discussion is intended to share information with others
>   and learn from others. We want to discuss the zero point
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>   who need to learn from each other and from the highly
>   educated. State your reason for the censorship here...mykey

 Are you talking about the thread "The Zero Point Field"Andrew
Cunnungham started?

 If so, in spite of the objections I raised there, I'd like to
mention a possible ZPF tap technology I thought up after reading some
papers Robert L. Forward co-wrote about the Casimir Effect. (The
papers were available as pdf's on Forward's website until he died, but
I haven't been able to find them online recently.)

 Forward et. al. pointed out that the usual arrangement of two
parallel conductive plates is a special case of a general effect;
another special case is the conductive hollow six-sided right prism,
or box.

 They also point out that the form factor of the box (from long and
skinny, through cube, to "pizza box") determines the signs of the
internal energy _and_ the internal energy density. They are opposite
for the two extremes mentioned, which serendipitously combined in my
mind with a text I'd just read on resonant microwave cavities.

 It seems reasonable to extrapolate that if one (or arrays) of each
extreme of box (presumably of equal volume) were fitted with
externally-accessible field probes (in other words they're resonant
cavities at one of those "loud frequencies"), and an electrical load
were connected between them with properly constructed lines, the load
ought to draw power directly from the ZPF. It should even work if the
entire apparatus is within a Faraday shield.

 As for sizing the cavities, ISTR the "loud" end of the ZPF spectrum
is the short-wavelength end, so little tiny cavities are indicated.

 "Checkerboarding" arrays of the two shapes of cavity might minimize
the hazardous side-effects I mentioned by cancellation.

 Unfortunately, this implies by symmetry that putting a power
_source_ in the connecting line should pump power _into_ the ZPF,
producing the inverse of my alleged side-effects. This baldly equates
to an RF source coupled through circulators (to prevent awkward
reflections) to two opposite kinds of cavity and producing something
other than hot cavities, something exotic. I don't know that this has
been tried except accidentally, but I strongly suspect any "exotic"
effect would be easiest observabed with expensively-small hardware.

 Still, if there's a gravitational side-effect, a properly arranged
set of driven cavities should self-accelerate by reacting against the
ZPF.

 Anybody got access to a semiconductor fab facility?

 Mark L. Fergerson
MYKEY - 19 Aug 2004 19:10 GMT
>   If so, in spite of the objections I raised there, I'd like to
> mention a possible ZPF tap technology I thought up after reading some
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>   Mark L. Fergerson

  Mr. Fergerson I believe you are correct. The zpf does seem to have a
  resonant frequency which could be amplified in a properly designed cavity.
  air being forced into an organ pipe will cause the pipe to resonate
  a sine wave musical note. The "squeeze" of the zpf behaves in a similar
  way. squeezing that energy into a cavity results in a resonant sine
  wave which is detectable by a properly designed coil or transformer.
  I think your really getting it.  mykey
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.