Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / November 2004

Look up LeSage gravity.

Double-A

If that was so, then there wouldn't be any attraction betwen these large
objects, would be?
And we know for sure that there is.

Hi Robert

Like you I had this idea (about 10 years ago) and got on the internet
and found ten other people with the same idea. And then I was told that
it was called LeSage gravity and had been around almost since Newton's time.

The idea is basically sound and for producing an inverse square gravity.

However there are a few catches. The main one is that if these little
particles or waves were to bounce off the big bodies, then there would
be no gravitational effect whatsoever. That is because the shadow that
they cast is exactly balanced by the reflections from the other side. If
you work this out fully and carefully then there is no nett force.

The catch is that if they don't bounce off then the idea works. Actually
even a small proportion of the energy being retained by the matter of
the big bodies is quite ample for the idea to work.

Gravity is a very weak force compared to the Coloumb and strong forces,
some 10^40 weaker roughly. So we can assume that this figure is telling
us something about the proportion of absorption of this universal flux
(be it particles or waves) and that 10^-40 of all energy flux passing
through the inner wavelenth (about 10^-13 cm) of a nucleon will be absorbed.

It is also helpful to realise that this flux is actually the incoming
wave of the standing wave of the particle itself. In other words the
outgoing wave is 10^-40 weaker than the incoming. It might be reasonable
to ask where this went? The answer is that matter is made of nonlinear
waves, and we know that because light doesn't just go through
unaffected. Nonlinear standing waves are inherently unstable and must
form harmonics - smaller waves at multiples of the frequency. It is this
process that reduces the outgoing wave. See http://www.ray.tomes.biz/ 
for more details about these harmonics and how they explain the whole
structure of the universe.

When this 10^-40 absorption of energy is allowed for we must recognise
that the mass of "particles" is increasing over time at a rate of 10^-40
per 10^-23 s because that is how often another wave of the standing wave
goes through the centre. Or we could say at a rate of 10^-17 per second
or 10^-10 per year. That means that all particles masses are growing at
a rate of 1 part in 10^10 per year, which means that distant galaxies
will be seen as they were long ago, when all particles were lighter and
therefore all wavelengths were redder (yes nucleon mass and light
frequency are in a strict proportion). Unfortunately this effect has
been mistaken for expansion of the universe - what a blunder!

gohook@gmail.com (Robert Keller) wrote in message

I'm happy to see other people are on the same wavelength.  I also came
up with the same idea.  If you go to my site, you'll find my paper
about it, including the math.

http://www.geocities.com/bpj1138

click on Shielding Effect...

--Bart