 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / May 2006Falling into time?
Just as an exercise, I have been working through some scenarios of time. I have come across one that works pretty well, although I am sure others have worked it out further than I, so I thought I would ask. I was looking at time as if we were falling down through it. That would mean as we pass the seconds, we would move from a higher chronometric state to lower ones, losing chronometric energy. Now if we move to the "side" (any of the three spatial dimentions) it takes us a little bit longer to fall (towards whatever the center of time might be). If we travel fast enough, we go sub-orbital, and we seem to travel through time quite slowly. At the local speed of light, we orbit the center of time and stop falling through it at all. Just a sort of literary gimmick, since I can't do the math, but I would appreciate seeing anything similar if someone has seen it. TIA falling implies some kind of velocity relative to something else, how would such a velocity come about? could the big bang have given us the push in the time dimension and we are now coasting for ever? or is there a time-like gravitational force and something is sucking us in, perhaps accelerating through time? does this mean we exist at only one point in time and if we did travel forward or backward in time there would be no trace of us? would we find other 3d worlds falling parallel to us at the same rate? what would happen if something was falling at a different rate and passed through our time, could we perceive it as it went by? would it create a disturbance in our 'universe', perhaps gamma ray bursts are from higher (or lower) 'speed' objects falling through our time? if indeed we were getting sucked in to something and accelerating through time such that the speed of light was changing, could we detect it? or would everything scale accordingly and everything that 'depends' on the speed of light, or the speed of time, would change such that the difference couldn't be measured?? just some things to think about... > Just as an exercise, I have been working through some scenarios of time. I > have come across one that works pretty well, although I am sure others [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > TIA "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote : > or is there a > time-like gravitational force and something is sucking us in, perhaps > accelerating through time? All I know for sure is that the days seemed endless when I was young and foolish. Now that I am older they seem to pass at a much faster rate. > just some things to think about... Thanks much. I am typing out some things that might be at least funny and perhaps even interesting. Your questions help. Time based on rest mass, but the environment changes the rest mass. If the rest mass becomes negative kilograms, time may flow backwards. Measuring someone in negative kilograms means his body is not attracting other matter gravitationally, but repelling other mass. Yeh, I`m working on this one too (not as though anyone would notice)... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley Clarke ------------------------------------------------------- |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.