Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Vres - 02 Feb 2008 14:34 GMT
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

    There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to get
the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly
CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the
Earth. A pair of graphs on page 6 of "An  Inconvenient Book", by Glenn Beck,
shows that premise to be completely false. (I am currently attempting to
determine the source and validity of the data.) These graphs cover a period
of time between 1870 and 2000. As anyone with more than a double digit IQ
can plainly see, if this data is valid, then what we assert to be global
warming is due to Solar activity and not to man's activities. Furthermore,
the correlation is so obvious that a reasonable man would assert that the
Global Warming scare does not represent truth but is propaganda for some
ulterior motive. No scientist could be stupid enough not to recognize the
implications of these curves and have survived the PhD process.

    The first pair of curves shows artic temperatures over the 130 year
period and the solar activity. The correlation between the curves is almost
perfect, indicating an extremely strong cause and effect relationship! The
second pair of curves shows the CO2 content of the atmosphere and the arctic
temperature over the same time period. The correlation between these curves
is virtually non-existent. Providing I am able to verify the data
represented by these curves, it is reasonable to assert that Al Gore et al
are not merely mistaken, they are deliberately lying.

    In all of the discussions of global warming, it has not been possible
to find any description of the actual mechanism by which CO2 etc. affect the
surface temperature of the Earth. All of the discussions seem to assume that
it is the amount of greenhouse gasses in the volume of the atmosphere which
control the Earth's surface temperature. That assumption is false! Earth's
temperature is determined by the altitude amd temperature of the "CO2
horizon". It is at this altitude and below the greenhouse gases cause the
atmosphere to be opaque to the 10 to 14.5 micron band of electromagnetic
radiation. It is the greenhouse gases at this altitude that radiate the
Earth's energy input (internal and solar) to space. No greenhouse radiation
to space occurs since below this altitude (about 55,000 feet) since any such
radiation is re-absorbed by the gasses above. The equilibrium temperature
for re-radiation of Earth's energy input to space is about -55C. (Depends
upon Solar input, ice cover and internal heat). Heat transfer from lower
levels to the CO2 horizon is primarily by convection. From the altitude of
the CO2 horizon downward, the atmospheres absolute temperature rises due to
adiabatic compression in proportion to the pressure ratio raised to the 1.35
power (see any thermodynamics text). It is this adiabatic temperature rise
which determined the surface temperature. It is This adiabatic temperature
rise effect from CO2 horizon is atop a very thick atmosphere which causes
the surface of Venus to be so hot. It is not the amount of greenhouse
contained in the bulk of the atmosphere.

    All of the information needed to determine the global warming effects
of greenhouse gasses can be obtained by directly measuring the altitude at
which the atmosphere becomes opaque in the 10 to 14.5 micron band of
electromagnetic radiation. Its a simple observation readily made by
satellite. With this data, the Earth's average equilibrium surface
temperature is readily determined. The effort does not require a battalion
of PhDs,

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 17 Feb 2008 18:25 GMT
OH YA IT IS  Bert
Benj - 17 Feb 2008 22:11 GMT
> Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

I hope there have been no objective rebuttals of this new theory...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.