Natural Science Forum / Physics / New Theories / December 2003

      God=G_uv   The Big Picture

  So many people have criticized God=G_uv
that it is now becoming widley known as a
"kook theory" (among amateurs).
  The main reason  is that no one can
understand the theory.
  So..... I have devised a simple
"rubber rod and clock"  model similar to
that used to explain Einstein's theory.
  The following explanation of the theory
can be understood by an amateur in Relativity
theory.
  FURTHERMORE, no attack on the theory is
valid unless it begins with an attack on
the existence of the following simple
(alleged) phenomena:

       **ALLEGED PHENOMENA**
   Reality shrinks and slows down
   for the first 18 years of life.

  Imagine an 18 year old adult and a 9 year
old (half grown) child watching a Merry-go-round.
The Merry-go-round appears to be
turning twice as fast and looks twice as
large to the 9 year old as it does to the
18 year old.  Yet, we know they BOTH
agree that according to the clock on
the top of the Merry-go-round that it is
turning at exactly 5 rpm.  We also know
that BOTH of them will measure it with a
tape measure to be 30 feet in diameter.
STILL, I say it "looks twice as fast and
twice as big" to the 9 year old.
  I point out that this is actually a
"provable" statement, although since we
all remember being 9 years old, I won't
go into the experimental proof here unless
someone challenges the statement.  It can
be physically measured by psychometry.
  NOW, I point out that this phenomena
has a well known parallel to a similar
situation in Relativity.
  If two observers watch the Earth from
remote locations, say one on the
Moon and one parked next to a Black Hole,
they will see the Earth rotate at different
speeds.  The Moon observer sees the Earth
rotate once in 24 hours, while the Black
Hole observer sees it rotate, say, twice in
24 hours.  Yet, they BOTH agree that according
to a clock sitting on the Earth's North Pole,
that the Earth is rotating only once every
24 hours.  Not only that, according to Relativity,
the Earth will look twice as large to the
observer parked next to the Black Hole.
This as we know, is due to the large
gravitational field next to the Black
Hole.
  Now... I say, that these two situations
are in fact physically identical (this is
an *EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE*).  I say they
are BOTH caused by GRAVITY, and the size
and speed difference obeys Einstein's
theory in both cases.
  The (psychometric/relativistic) proof of
this is given on my website so I won't
reiterate it here.

  But what I'm saying, is that everyone
has an "internal clock" and an "internal
ruler" by which they judge the size and
speed of the world. This is the clock and
ruler of THEIR PERSONAL coordinate system
(subjective World).  Meanwhile, the "clock
on the wall", and the "ruler on the table",
is the clock and ruler of the "REAL WORLD"
(the universal objective World).
  What the theory says then, is that every
observer of the "real world" is actually
in an "effective gravitational field" (EGF)
the strength of which depends on his state of
growth, and this EGF "curves" his "personal
world" in the SAME WAY that an ordinary
gravitational field curves the real world.
  On my website it is demonstrated how
the existence of this "effective gravitational
field" is EXPERIMENTALLY PROVEN, and suggests
an obvious physical origin for it although I
stress for the benefit of pedants that the
PROOF that it EXISTS does NOT depend on
the explanation of the origin of it,
just as the PROOF of Einstein's theory does
NOT depend the explanation of the "quantum
gravity" origin of it.

 OK, so that's it.  Fact is, this phenomena
has been known since Adam and Eve... the fact
that "growth" produces a shrinking and slowing
of the World.  But I remind you that Einstein
is famous for positing:

   EINSTEIN'S EQUIVALENCE
          PRINCIPLE
 Gravity is "equivalent" to a
 curvature of objective reality

But this fact was known for hundreds of years
before Einstein since "g" was called the
"acceleration of gravity" for centuries before
Einstein was born.  He simply identified it as
a fundamental principle.
 I say I am simply doing the same thing by
positing an "Equivalence Principle" that
relates Growth to Curvature:

       HAMMOND'S EQUIVALENCE
            PRINCIPLE
  Growth is "equivalent" to a
  curvature of subjective reality

Actually, this has been observed (in children)
since the beginning of the world, but I am simply
positing it, like Einstein, as the basis of a
scientific explanation of (subjective) Reality.
The importance of this being that it
SCIENTIFICALLY EXPLAINS GOD.  "God" is simply
the difference between subjective and objective
reality... a difference that we all know about,
because while everyones "objective reality"
is the same, everyones "subjective reality"
is different... this is particularly obvious
in the case of children vs. adults, but it is
also noticible to the keen observer in differences
between ADULTS also.  In fact, this difference
is what causes all human conflict!
  The proof that it explains God, is that Science
has discovered that no adult ever reaches full
growth, therefore we all have a "residual curvature"
in our "realities", and this causes the phenomena
known as "God".
  QED, there actually is a real God!

________________________________________________

  I reiterate, unless you can refute this basic
*EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE*, then you CANNOT refute
the theory... just as you must refute a similar
"Equivalence Principle" in order to disprove Einstein's
theory.  This is because Einstein's EP leads directly
to:

          Gravity=G_uv

and Hammond's EP leads directly
to:

           God=G_uv.

they are the SAME THEORY applied to *objective*
reality by Einstein, and *subjective* reality by
Hammond!  We see that in fact, Hammond's discovery
is founded on Einstein's discovery.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================