I would have thought that in the deeper waters ice would remain un
effected. however when the tsunami wave comes closer to shore the ice
will face increasing pressure from the water. as the water ahead of the
wave is pulled out as the wave approaches, the ice next to shore is
likley to slip down. I would then expect the wave to either penetrate
the ice completely or not at all depending on the size of tsunami and
thickness of ice.
This is simply my theoretical opinion. I would be interested in any
obeservation or studies into this.
steve
BHerb - 28 Feb 2005 22:13 GMT
Depends on how polar you're talking. I mean how far north or south. If
your talking in Antarctica, then no. Tsunamis are the wave caused by a
submarine event (earthquake, eruption, etc.). So it would simply be an
earthquake. If you're talking northpole, i believe that far enough
north it's solid ice and the quake would transfer it's enrgy similaly
to a land based quake. An offshore quake sending a tsunami toward an
ice shelf however would (in my opinion) serve to break some of the ice.
I don't think the period is long enough though to say break off the
entire Ross Ice Shelf from Antarctica. Though i think that's one of
those thatng that under the right (or wrong) circumstances there's no
telling exactly what could happen. Very interesting question though.